Article Sidebar

pdf
Date Published: 23/12/2024
Abstract Views: 33
Views pdf: 37
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v545i3.12352
Issue
Vol. 545 No. 3 (2024)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Nguyễn, T. D., & Hoàng, V. V. (2024). STUDYING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOME HEMODYNAMIC INDICATORS AND CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE (CVP) USING DOPPLER ULTRASOUND (USCOM - ULTRASONIC CARDIAC OUTPUT MONITOR) IN SEVERE BURN PATIENTS IN THE FIRST 8 HOURS AFTER THE BURN. Vietnam Medical Journal, 545(3). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v545i3.12352

STUDYING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SOME HEMODYNAMIC INDICATORS AND CENTRAL VENOUS PRESSURE (CVP) USING DOPPLER ULTRASOUND (USCOM - ULTRASONIC CARDIAC OUTPUT MONITOR) IN SEVERE BURN PATIENTS IN THE FIRST 8 HOURS AFTER THE BURN

Tiến Dũng Nguyễn, Văn Vụ Hoàng

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: Evaluating some hemodynamic indicators and their relationship with CVP in severe burn patients in the first 8 hours after burn using USCOM. Subject and methods: A study was conducted on 30 severe burn patients, who were treated at the Intensive Care Unit, National Burn Hospital in the first 8 hours after burn, from August, 2023 to May, 2024. These patients were measured Cardiac Output (CO), Cardiac Index (CI), Stroke Volume (SV), Stroke Volume Index (SVI), Inotropic Index (INO), Stroke Volume Variation (SVV), and Folw Time Corrected (FTc) and Central Venous Pressure (CVP) by USCOM. Results: CO (2.87 ± 0.94 ml/min), CI (1.69 ± 0.52 ml/min/m2), SV (27.9 ml), SVI (16.5 ml/m2), FTc (287.2 ms), and INO (0.94W) all decreased below normal thresholds. SVV (30.9%) was elevated at admission. SVI, SVV and FTc were closely correlated with CVP. Conclusion: CO, CI, SV, SVI, FTc of severe burn patients decreased within 8 hours after the burn. SVI, SVV and FTc can be substituted for CVP in assessing cardiac preload.

Article Details

Keywords

Severe Burn injury, Cardiac preload, Central Venous Pressure, USCOM

References

Học viện Quân Y (2018). Giáo trình bỏng, Nhà xuất bản quân đội nhân dân, Hà Nội.
2. Phùng Văn Dũng (2017). Ứng dụng kỹ thuật siêu âm Doppler bằng máy USCOM để theo dõi và đánh giá huyết động ở BN nhiễm khuẩn nặng và sốc nhiễm khuẩn, Luận văn Thạc sĩ y học, Đại học y Hà Nội.
3. Gong C, Zhang F, Li L.et al (2017). The variation of hemodynamic parameters through PiCCO in the early stage after severe burns. Journal of burn care & research, 38 (6), e966-e972.
4. Wang G.Y, Ma B., Tang H.T et al (2008). Esophageal echo-Doppler monitoring in burn shock resuscitation: are hemodynamic variables the critical standard guiding fluid therapy? Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, 65 (6):1396-1401.
5. Holm C, Mayr M, Tegeler J et al (2004). A clinical randomized study on the effects of invasive monitoring on burn shock resuscitation. Burns, 30 (8):798-807.
6. Mundy L, Merlin T. L, Braunack M. A. J et al (2007). USCOM: Ultrasound cardiac output monitor for patients requiring haemodynamic monitoring.
7. Arlati S, Storti E, Pradella V et al. (2007). Decreased fluid volume to reduce organ damage: a new approach to burn shock resuscitation? A preliminary study. Resuscitation, 72 (3):371-378.
8. Yu Y, Dai H, Yan M et al (2009). An evaluation of stroke volume variation as a predictor of fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated elderly patients with severe sepsis. Zhongguo wei Zhong Bing ji jiu yi xue= Chinese Critical Care Medicine= Zhongguo Weizhongbing Jijiuyixue, 21 (8):463-465.
9. Monnet X, Rienzo M, Osman D.et al (2005). Esophageal Doppler monitoring predicts fluid responsiveness in critically ill ventilated patients. Intensive care medicine, 31:1195-1201.
10. Lee J, Kim J, Yoon S et al (2007). Evaluation of corrected flow time in oesophageal Doppler as a predictor of fluid responsiveness. British journal of anaesthesia, 99 (3):343-348.