RESULTS OF ARTERY PRESSURE COMPRESSION IN CARDIVASCULAR CATHETERIZATION LABORATORY AT HANOI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the results of arterial puncture site compression and influencing factors at the Cardiovascular Center, Hanoi Medical University Hospital. Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study on all patients who underwent intervention from August 2023 to May 2024. Results: 88.5% of patients had no complications after arterial puncture, the rate of complications monitored included hematoma: 7.8%, bleeding: 2.4%, pseudoaneurysm: 1.7%, embolism: 2.0%. Risk factors affecting the results of arterial puncture include gender, underlying vascular disease, puncture site, instrument size, and procedure time. Conclusion: The technical procedure for controlling bleeding at the arterial puncture site has a high success rate but choosing the appropriate puncture site and catheter size also needs to be carefully considered.
Article Details
Keywords
pressure compression, complications, arterial puncture site
References
![](https://tapchiyhocvietnam.vn/templates/images/icons/gscholar.png)
2. Trần Bá Hiếu, Trần Ngọc Cầm, Vũ Thị Ngọc Ánh, Huỳnh Thị Nhung. Tỷ lệ biến chứng mạch máu tại chỗ sau chụp và/hoặc can thiệp động mạch vành tại đơn vị chăm sóc mạch vành - C7 Viện Tim mạch - Bệnh viện Bạch Mai. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2022;527.
![](https://tapchiyhocvietnam.vn/templates/images/icons/gscholar.png)
3. Jolly SS, Yusuf S, Cairns J, et al. Radial versus femoral access for coronary angiography and intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (RIVAL): a randomised, parallel group, multicentre trial. Lancet. 2011;377(9775):1409-1420.
![](https://tapchiyhocvietnam.vn/templates/images/icons/gscholar.png)
4. Valgimigli M. Design and rationale for the Minimizing Adverse haemorrhagic events by TRansradial access site and systemic Implementation of angioX program. American heart journal. 2014;168(6):838-845.e836.
![](https://tapchiyhocvietnam.vn/templates/images/icons/gscholar.png)
5. Le May M, Wells G, So D, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Femoral Access vs Radial Access in ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction: The SAFARI-STEMI Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA cardiology. 2020;5(2):126-134.
![](https://tapchiyhocvietnam.vn/templates/images/icons/gscholar.png)
6. Ferrante G, Rao SV, Jüni P, et al. Radial Versus Femoral Access for Coronary Interventions Across the Entire Spectrum of Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. JACC Cardiovascular interventions. 2016;9(14):1419-1434.
![](https://tapchiyhocvietnam.vn/templates/images/icons/gscholar.png)
7. Mehta SR, Jolly SS, Cairns J, et al. Effects of radial versus femoral artery access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012;60(24):2490-2499.
![](https://tapchiyhocvietnam.vn/templates/images/icons/gscholar.png)