ASSESSMENT OF THE CORRELATION OF BLOOD VESSEL DENSITY IN THE MACULA WITH VISUAL FIELD DEFECT IN PRIMARY OPEN-ANGLE GLAUCOMA PATIENTS WITH HIGH MYOPIA

Kim Thành Đoàn, Anh Tuấn Trần, Thị Uyên Duyên Nguyễn, Trường Đăng Minh Phạm

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the macular vascular density (VD) and correlation between macular VD and visual field defect in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) with high myopia. Methods: This cross-sectional descriptive study was performed on 40 POAG eyes with high myopia. VD, Macular Ganglion Cell–Inner Plexiform Layer Thickness (GCIPLT) were measured and the correlation between global and sectoral macular VD with visual field mean sensitivity (VFMS) in each region according to Rolle’s structure-function map was assessed. The correlation between VFMS and GCIPLT was evaluated and multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess the influence of VD and GCIPLT on VFMS. Results: While the global visual field indexes were correlated with the global macular GCIPLT, the correlation of the global macular VD was only statistically significant with mean deviation. The global, superior, nasal, inferior, temporal macular GCIPLT and the outer global, outer inferior macular VD were correlated with the corresponding VFMS. In the multivariate regression analysis, only the global GCIPLT was significantly correlated with the corresponding VFMS. The VFMS corresponding to the inferior macula was statistically significantly correlated with the outer inferior VD, whereas no correlation with GCIPLT was observed in this region. Conclusion: VD may be a necessary adjunct to GCIPLT to monitor the progression of glaucomatous visual field defects in highly myopic eyes, especially in the outer inferior macula

Article Details

References

Sun MT, Tran M, Singh K, Chang R, Wang H, Sun Y. Glaucoma and Myopia: Diagnostic Challenges. Biomolecules. Mar 20 2023;13(3)doi: 10.3390/biom13030562
2. Wu JH, Moghimi S, Nishida T, Mahmoudinezhad G, L MZ, Weinreb RN. Association of macular vessel density and ganglion cell complex thickness with central visual field progression in glaucoma. Br J Ophthalmol. Nov 22 2023;107(12):1828-1833. doi:10.1136/ bjo-2022-321870
3. Tao A, Liang Y, Chen J, et al. Structure-function correlation of localized visual field defects and macular microvascular damage in primary open-angle glaucoma. Microvasc Res. Jul 2020; 130: 104005. doi:10.1016/j.mvr. 2020. 104005
4. Rao HL, Pradhan ZS, Weinreb RN, et al. A comparison of the diagnostic ability of vessel density and structural measurements of optical coherence tomography in primary open angle glaucoma. PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0173930. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0173930
5. Rao HL, Pradhan ZS, Weinreb RN, et al. Regional Comparisons of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography Vessel Density in Primary Open-Angle Glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. Nov 2016;171:75-83. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2016. 08.030
6. Lee JY, Shin JW, Song MK, Hong JW, Kook MS. Glaucoma diagnostic capabilities of macular vessel density on optical coherence tomography angiography: superficial versus deep layers. Br J Ophthalmol. Sep 2022;106(9):1252-1257. doi:10. 1136/bjophthalmol-2020-318449
7. Lee A, Shin JW, Lee JY, Baek MS, Kook MS. Association of Superficial and Deep Macular Microvasculature with Central Visual Field Sensitivity in Glaucomatous Eyes with High Myopia. J Clin Med. Jul 29 2022;11(15)doi: 10.3390/jcm11154430
8. Garway-Heath DF, Poinoosawmy D, Fitzke FW, Hitchings RA. Mapping the visual field to the optic disc in normal tension glaucoma eyes. Ophthalmology. Oct 2000;107(10):1809-15. doi:10.1016/s0161-6420(00)00284-0
9. Rezapour J, Bowd C, Dohleman J, et al. Macula structural and vascular differences in glaucoma eyes with and without high axial myopia. Br J Ophthalmol. Jun 20 2022;doi: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2021-320430
10. Lai C, Chuang LH, Lai CC, Liu CF, Yang JW, Chen HSL. Longitudinal changes in optical coherence tomography angiography characteristics in normal-tension glaucoma with or without high myopia. Acta Ophthalmol. Aug 2024;102(5):e762-e773. doi:10.1111/aos.16644