Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 24/10/2021
Abstract Views: 272
Views PDF: 168
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v506i2.1288
Issue
Vol. 506 No. 2 (2021)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Thị Thanh Tâm, Đỗ ., Thị Thái Hà, T. ., Hồng Vân, L. ., & Thị Nhung, C. . (2021). APEXIFICATION OF IMMATURE PERMANENT TEETH WITH MINERAL TRIOXYDE AGGREGATE: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW. Vietnam Medical Journal, 506(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v506i2.1288

APEXIFICATION OF IMMATURE PERMANENT TEETH WITH MINERAL TRIOXYDE AGGREGATE: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW

Đỗ Thị Thanh Tâm1,, Trịnh Thị Thái Hà1, Lê Hồng Vân1, Cao Thị Nhung2
1 The Odonto-Stomatology Training Institute, Hanoi Medical University
2 Hanoi Textile and Garment Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objectives: The aim of this study was to conduct a quantitative systematic review, including published data, comparing the efficacy of mineral trioxide aggregate as material used for the endodontic management of immature teeth. Methods: A systematic review of the intervention group using MTA, the control group using calcium hydroxide (Ca(OH)2). In subjects with imature permanent teeth because of necrotizing pulp disease or chronic apical periodontitis. Results: The time required for apical barrier formation of MTA group range from 1,35 ± 0,275 months to 3,0 ± 2,9 months while Ca(OH)2 group ranged from 1.95 ± 0.45 months to 7.93 ± 2.53 months. Apical barrier formation rate in the MTA group ranged from 7 to 29 teeth, in the Ca(OH)2 group range from 9 to 27 teeth. The clinical success rate of apical closure of teeth in the MTA group ranged from 90% to 100%. The clinical success rate in the control groups ranged from 73.30% to 93.33%. The radiographic success rate in the MTA group ranged from 82.4% to 100% but in the Ca(OH)2 groups ranged from 75% to 93.33%. Conclusion: both MTA and Ca(OH)2 materials have similar clinical success rate and radiographic success rates. However, the time required for apical barrier formation in this study of MTA was significantly shorter than that of Ca(OH)2.

Article Details

Keywords

Immature permanent teeth, MTA, Apexification

References

1. Yuan Chen. Materials for pulpotomy in immature permanent teeth: a systematic review and meta-analysis - PubMed. Accessed August 20, 2021. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31647004/
2. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg Lond Engl. 2010;8(5):336-341. doi:10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007
3. Plascencia H, Díaz M, Gascón G, et al. Management of permanent teeth with necrotic pulps and open apices according to the stage of root development. J Clin Exp Dent. 2017;9(11):e1329-e1339. doi:10.4317/jced.54287
4. Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, et al. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. John Wiley & Sons; 2019.
5. Jia-Cheng Lin. Comparison of mineral trioxide aggregate and calcium hydroxide for apexification of immature permanent teeth: A systematic review and meta-analysis - PubMed. Accessed August 20, 2021. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26911724/
6. Torabinejad M, Hong CU, McDonald F, Pitt Ford TR. Physical and chemical properties of a new root-end filling material. J Endod. 1995; 21(7): 349-353. doi:10.1016/S0099-2399(06) 80967-2
7. Rafter M. Apexification: a review. Dent Traumatol Off Publ Int Assoc Dent Traumatol. 2005;21(1):1-8. doi:10.1111/j.1600-9657.2004.00284.x
8. No Authour. Appendix: Jadad Scale for Reporting Randomized Controlled Trials. In: Evidence-Based Obstetric Anesthesia. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2005:237-238. doi:10.1002/ 9780470988343.app1
9. Chala S, Abouqal R, Rida S. Apexification of immature teeth with calcium hydroxide or mineral trioxide aggregate: systematic review and meta-analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;112(4):e36-42. doi:10.1016/j.tripleo.2011.03.047