Article Sidebar

pdf
Date Published: 26/03/2025
Abstract Views: 147
Views pdf: 53
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v547i1.12913
Issue
Vol. 547 No. 1 (2025)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Nguyễn, P. T., Đàm, V. V., Nguyễn, T. V. T., & Nguyễn, T. H. (2025). RESULTS OF LATE IMPLANTATION IN PATIENTS WITH ALVEOLAR DEFECT USING GUIDE REGENERATION BONE TECHNIQUE AND SANTA. Vietnam Medical Journal, 547(1). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v547i1.12913

RESULTS OF LATE IMPLANTATION IN PATIENTS WITH ALVEOLAR DEFECT USING GUIDE REGENERATION BONE TECHNIQUE AND SANTA

Phú Thắng Nguyễn, Văn Việt Đàm, Thị Việt Thành Nguyễn, Thị Hạnh Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the effect of guided bone regeneration (GBR) combined with SANTA on patients with late implantation. Subjects and methods: 23 patients with 28 implant sites with GBR technique and SANTA usage. The size of bone covering implant was measured on Cone beam CT (CBCT) taken immediately after implantation and after six months of healing. Results: After the bone grafting, the size of the bone covering the implants on CBCT films was increased, the height dimension was 4.43 ± 1.57 mm, in the buccolingual dimension at the implant platform was 2.83 ± 0.87 mm and the distance from the implant platform 2.0 mm towards the apex was 3.53 ± 1.13 mm. Conclusion: The study results found that bone defect were optimally restored to cover the implant, proving that the combination of GBR technique and SANTA was effective.

Article Details

Keywords

Guided bone regeneration, SANTA.

References

Kim YK, Ku JK. Guided bone regeneration. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2020;46(5): 361-366. doi:10.5125/jkaoms.2020. 46.5.361
2. Kim O, Choi J, Kim B, Seo D. Long-term success rates of implants with guided bone regeneration or bone grafting. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2020; 31(S20):230-230. doi:10.1111/clr.171_ 13644
3. Wang X, Wang G, Zhao X, Feng Y, Liu H, Li F. Short-Term Evaluation of Guided Bone Reconstruction with Titanium Mesh Membranes and CGF Membranes in Immediate Implantation of Anterior Maxillary Tooth. BioMed Res Int. 2021;2021:4754078. doi:10.1155/2021/4754078
4. Iglesias-Velázquez Ó, Zamora RS, López-Pintor RM, et al. Periosteal Pocket Flap technique for lateral ridge augmentation. A comparative pilot study versus guide bone regeneration. Ann Anat - Anat Anz. 2022;243: 151950. doi:10.1016/j.aanat.2022.151950
5. Abdullrahman F, Assad M, Albash Z. Tent-pole technique for alveolar ridge width preservation with a compromised buccal plate: a prospective cohort study. Ann Med Surg. 2023; 85(11): 5344. doi:10.1097/MS9. 0000000000001312
6. Doan TL, Le LD. Efficacy of the Tent-Pole Technique in Horizontal Ridge Augmentation. Pesqui Bras Em Odontopediatria E Clínica Integrada. 2020;20: e5643. doi:10.1590/pboci. 2020.109
7. Woo RH, Kim HG, Kim G, Park WE, Sohn DS. Simplified 3-Dimensional Ridge Augmentation Using A Tenting Abutment. Adv Dent Oral Health. 2020;12(1): 0185-0205. doi:10.19080/ADOH. 2019.22.55830
8. Utilization of Tenting Pole Abutments for the Reconstruction of Severely Resorbed Alveolar Bone: Technical Considerations and Case Series Reports. Accessed October 2, 2024. https://www.mdpi.com/2077-0383/13/4/1156
9. Tenting pole abutment technique for the easy reconstruction of severely resorbed alveolar ridges. Accessed October 2, 2024. http://ouci.dntb.gov.ua/en/ works/7q3PQ0Jl/
10. guidelines_Konsensus-Leitfaden-2013_engl.pdf. Accessed October 4, 2024. https://bdizedi.org/wp-content/uploads/pdf/GuidelinesEuropeanConsensusConference/guidelines_Konsensus-Leitfaden-2013_engl.pdf