EVALUATION OF SOME CLINICAL, PARACLINICAL FACTORS AND COMPARISON OF THE VALUES OF MORTALITY PROGNOSIS SCORES IN PATIENTS WITH INTRACEREBRAL HAEMORRHAGE AT PHU THO PROVINCIAL GENERAL HOSPITAL

Huy Ngọc Nguyễn, Quang Anh Đào, Quang Lục Trần, Quốc Việt Hoàng

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background and aims: To evaluate some clinical and paraclinical factors and mortality prognostic scores in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage. Methods: A retrospective descriptive study on 148 patients with intracerebral haemorrhage at Phu Tho General Hospital from January 2022 to September 2024 to identify some factors predicting mortality within 30 days. Logistic regression and ROC curves were used to calculate the prognostic value of some mortality risk factors, comparing the prognostic value of the scores with each other to find the best score. Results: Sample characteristics include males (72.3%), mean age 63.5±13.1. The 30-day mortality rate is 31.1%. The odds ratio showed that GCS≤8 (OR: 8.944; 95%CI: 1.01-79.184), hydrocephalus (OR: 24.087; 95%CI: 3.798-152.775), and haemorrhage expansion (OR: 87.601; 95%CI: 6.854-1119.567) were independent predictors of patient mortality. Compared with the ICH, mICH, FUNC, MICH, and rICH scores for 30-day mortality, the Essen score had AUROCs of 0.896 versus 0.862, 0.882, 0.865, 0.821, and 0.866, respectively. At the cutoff point >6, the sensitivity was 75.6%; the specificity was 90.2%. Conclusion: GCS score ≤8, hydrocephalus, and haemorrhage expansion were independent predictors of patient mortality. The Essen score had the best predictive value for mortality in patients with intracerebral haemorrhage compared to the ICH, mICH, FUNC, MICH, and rICH scores.

Article Details

References

Lun R, Yogendrakumar V, Ramsay T, et al. Predicting long-term outcomes in acute intracerebral haemorrhage using delayed prognostication scores. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2021; 6(4): 536-541. doi:10.1136/svn-2020-000656
2. Vo HK, Nguyen CH, Vo HL. High In-Hospital Mortality Incidence Rate and Its Predictors in Patients with Intracranial Hemorrhage Undergoing Endotracheal Intubation. Neurol Int. 2021; 13(4):671-681. doi:10.3390/neurolint13040064
3. Hegde A, Menon G. Modifying the intracerebral hemorrhage score to suit the needs of the developing world. Ann Indian Acad Neurol. 2018;21(4):270. doi:10.4103/aian.AIAN_419_17
4. Hillal A, Ullberg T, Ramgren B, Wassélius J. Computed tomography in acute intracerebral hemorrhage: neuroimaging predictors of hematoma expansion and outcome. Insights Imaging. 2022;13(1):180. doi:10.1186/s13244-022-01309-1
5. Hemphill JC, Bonovich DC, Besmertis L, Manley GT, Johnston SC. The ICH Score: A Simple, Reliable Grading Scale for Intracerebral Hemorrhage. Stroke. 2001;32(4):891-897. doi:10.1161/01.STR.32.4.891
6. Gregório T, Pipa S, Cavaleiro P, et al. Assessment and Comparison of the Four Most Extensively Validated Prognostic Scales for Intracerebral Hemorrhage: Systematic Review with Meta-analysis. Neurocrit Care. 2019;30(2): 449-466. doi:10.1007/s12028-018-0633-6
7. Duong PT, Nguyen DT. Func score in prediction intracerebral hemorrhage patients at Hue central hospital. J Med Pharm. Published online June 2021:65-71. doi:10.34071/jmp.2021.3.9
8. Nguyễn Đình Toàn, Nguyễn Kiều My. Nghiên cứu ứng dụng thang điểm Essen trong tiên lượng bệnh nhân chảy máu não. J 108 - Clin Med Phamarcy. 2021;16(DB4). doi:10.52389/ydls. v16iDB4.949
9. Phan TG, Koh M, Vierkant RA, Wijdicks EFM. Hydrocephalus Is a Determinant of Early Mortality in Putaminal Hemorrhage. Stroke. 2000;31(9): 2157-2162. doi:10.1161/01.STR.31.9.2157
10. Weimar C. Development and validation of the Essen Intracerebral Haemorrhage Score. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2006;77(5):601-605. doi:10.1136/jnnp.2005.081117