THE VALIDITY OF THE RAPID ANTIGEN-BASED TEST FOR DIAGNOSING CHLAMYDIA TRACHOMATIS INFECTION

Mạnh Tuấn Hà, Thị Luyền Phạm, Tuấn Anh Trần, Ngọc Quỳnh Trâm Lê

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: The rapid tests for Chlamydia trachomatis infection can aid in disease management and reduce transmission. This study compares the rapid test with PCR test in diagnosing C. trachomatis infection to evaluate the validity of rapid test. Methodology: A cross-sectional study was conducted on patients over 18 years old with symptoms of genital discharge. Cervical swabs (for females) and urethral swabs (for males) were taken for both rapid testing and PCR test. Results: A total of 196 eligible patients were included in the study. Females accounted for 68.4%, and the age group over 25 years constituted 66.8% of the cohort. The prevalence of C. trachomatis was 14.3%. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of the rapid test were 53.6% (95% CI: 33.9-72.5%), 86.3% (95% CI: 80.2-91.1%), 39.5% (95% CI: 28.1-52.1%), and 91.8% (95% CI: 88.2-94.3%), respectively. Conclusion: The rapid test has lower sensitivity compared to PCR but is easier to perform, less expensive, and provides faster results. The rapid test remains valuable in disease management in settings with limited resources and low follow-up rates.

Article Details

References

World Health Organization. WHO Guidelines for the Treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2016.
2. World Health Organization. Guidelines for the management of symptomatic sexually transmitted infections. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2021.
3. World Health Organization. Point-of-care tests for sexually transmitted infections: target product profiles. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023.
4. Hanny Nilasari RIAK, Yeva Rosana, Fitri Azizah Diagnostic value of the QuickStripe™ chlamydia rapid test among high-risk women in Jakarta. Int J STD AIDS 2022; 33(6): 570-4.
5. Zhou Y, Jiang TT, Li J, Yin YP, Chen XS. Performance of point-of-care tests for the detection of chlamydia trachomatis infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine 2021; 37: 100961.
6. Peng L, Chen JL, Wang D. Progress and Perspectives in Point of Care Testing for Urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis Infection: A Review. Med Sci Monit 2020; 26: e920873