Article Sidebar

pdf
Date Published: 02/04/2025
Abstract Views: 79
Views pdf: 63
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v547i3.13111
Issue
Vol. 547 No. 3 (2025)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Đỗ Anh, T., & Đinh Ngọc, S. (2025). RESULT OF L5S1 DISC HERNIATION TREATMENT BY PERCUTANEOUS INTERLAMINAR ENDOSCOPIC LUMBAR DISCECTOMY IN VIET DUC UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL. Vietnam Medical Journal, 547(3). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v547i3.13111

RESULT OF L5S1 DISC HERNIATION TREATMENT BY PERCUTANEOUS INTERLAMINAR ENDOSCOPIC LUMBAR DISCECTOMY IN VIET DUC UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

Tuấn Đỗ Anh, Sơn Đinh Ngọc

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: A retrospective study on 50 patients with herniated disc L5-S1 were operated by PIELD at Spinal department of Viet Duc University Hospital from March 2020 to June 2021 aims to evaluate the clinical results of endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy at the L5S1 level. Results: The mean age was 43,82 ± 11,4 (minimal: 18, maximal: 64). Sex ratio 1.083/1, right side disc herniation was 54%, axillary type was 84%, migration was 42%. The mean VAS scores for leg and back pain decreased from 7,38 to 2,00 and 6,12 to 2.1, respectively. The mean ODI improved from 66,84% to 20,08%. The mean time to return to work was 4,2 weeks. Recurrent of disk herniations was observed in 3 cases (6%) and posoperative dysesthesia was observed in 2 cases (4%). The mean time of hospital stay was 2,32 days. Conclusion: With the results, PIELD is the safe, efficiency technique for treating herniated disc at L5S1

Article Details

Keywords

Percutaneous interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy, interlaminar, lumbar disc herniation, L5S1

References

1. Yeung, A. T., & Tsou, P. M. (2002). Posterolateral endoscopic excision for lumbar disc herniation: surgical technique, outcome, and complications in 307 consecutive cases. Spine, 27(7), 722–731.
2. Ruetten, S., Komp, M., Merk, H., Godolias, G. (2008). Full-endoscopic interlaminar and transforaminal lumbar discectomy versus conventional microsurgical technique: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Spine, 33(9), 931–939.
3. K. C. Choi, J. S. Kim, K. S. Ryu, B. U. Kang,, Y. Ahn., S. H. Lee K.C.C. (2013). Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for L5-S1 disc herniation: transforaminal versus interlaminar approach. Pain Physician, 16(6), 547–556.
4. Chen, H. C., Lee, C. H., Wei, L., Lui, T. N., Lin, T. J. (2015). Comparison of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and open lumbar surgery for adjacent segment degeneration and recurrent disc herniation. Neurol Res Int.
5. Choi, K. C., Lee, J. H., Kim, J. S., Sabal, L. A., Lee, S., Kim, H., & Lee, S. H. (2015). Unsuccessful percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a single-center experience of 10 228 cases. Neurosurgery, 76(4), 372–381.
6. Daniel H.Kim, Gun Choi & Sang-Ho Lee (2010). Interlaminar Surgical Approach in Endoscopic Spine Procedures. Thieme, 135.
7. Kim, C. H., Chung, C. K., Woo, J. W. (2016). Surgical outcome of percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar lumbar discectomy for highly migrated disk herniation. Clin Spine Surg, 29(5), E259–E266.
8. Wang H, Zhou Y, Zhang Z. Postoperative dysesthesia in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a report of five cases. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc. 2016; 25(5):1595-1600.doi:10.1007/s00586-015-4365-4