Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 16/12/2021
Abstract Views: 333
Views PDF: 187
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v507i1.1327
Issue
Vol. 507 No. 1 (2021)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Thị Hoa, B. ., Như Hùng, P. ., & Thị Phương Thảo, N. . (2021). TO EVALUATE PATIENT’S QUALITY OF LIFE ASPECTS AFTER PACEMKER IMPLANTATION, USING AQUAREL AND SF-12 QUESTIONNAIRES. Vietnam Medical Journal, 507(1). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v507i1.1327

TO EVALUATE PATIENT’S QUALITY OF LIFE ASPECTS AFTER PACEMKER IMPLANTATION, USING AQUAREL AND SF-12 QUESTIONNAIRES

Bạch Thị Hoa1,, Phạm Như Hùng1, Nguyễn Thị Phương Thảo1
1 Hanoi Heart Hospital

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Health-related quality of life evaluation is necessary to have an overview of the patient's quality of life, in order to have appropriate strategies to improve both mental and physical health of the patients. The objective of the study is to describe the quality of life of patients with bradycardia after permanent pacemaker implantation, using Aquarel and SF 12 questionnaires at Hanoi Heart Hospital. Subjects and methods: A prospective cross-sectional study of patients with permanent pacemaker implantation at Hanoi Heart Hospital from June 2020 to October 2020. STATA 14 software was used for data analysis. Results: A total of 105 patients were included in the study with mean age 65,35 ± 13.71 years and 62,86% female, The highest AQUAREL scores after implantation, when compared to before implantation, is bradyarrhythmia function (72,52 ± 16.83; 91.19 ± 9.03; 96.19 ± 5.70), while the lowest scores is chest discomfort (60.24 ± 12.07, 86.46 ± 10.52; 95, 36 ± 6.14). The SF-12 scores in mental health aspect (55.62 ± 8.14; 56.71 ± 4.58; 56.86 ± 2.47) are higher than that scores in physical health aspect (38.93 ± 8.07; 43.26 ± 7.89; 51.75 ± 5.54). Conclusion: The patient's quality of life scores after permanent pacemaker implantation improved and gradually increased after 1, 3, 6- month follow-up (according to the AQUAREL scale) and increased from low to quite high (according to SF 12 scale).

Article Details

Keywords

Quality of life, Permanent pacemaker, Bradycardia

References

1. Phạm Như Hùng, Trần Song Giang và công sự. “Thực trạng cấy máy tạo nhịp 1 buồng và 2 buồng tim trong điều trị nhịp chậm tại Viện tim mạch Việt Nam’’. Tạp chí tim mạch học Việt Nam số 65, 64-69 tạo nhịp tim. Luận văn tiến sĩ Y khoa: Học viện quân Y 103.2005.
2. Trương Đắc Cường. Nghiên cứu sự thay đổi chất lượng cuộc sống của bệnh nhân rối loạn nhịp chậm trước và sau cấy máy tạo nhịp tim vĩnh viễn. Đề tài tốt nghiệp Trường đại học Y Hà Nội năm 2014.
3. Đỗ Thị Diệu Linh (2015), Chất lượng cuộc sống của bệnh nhân rối loạn nhịp tim sau cấy máy tạo nhịp tim vĩnh viễn năm 2015. Đề tài tốt nghiệp cử nhân điều dưỡng, trường Đại học Thăng Long.
4. Mond HG, Proclemer A (2011). “ the 11th world survery of cảdiac pacing and implantable cardioverter – defibrillators: calendả year 2009 – a World society of Arrhythmia’s project”. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol, 34(8), 1013 – 1027.
5. Fleischmann K.E, Orav E.J, Lamas G.A, et al (2006). “Pacemaker implantation and quality of life in the Mode Selection Trial (MOST)”. Heart rhythm, 3(6), 653 – 659.
6. Barros R T d, Carvalho S M R d, Silva M A d M, et al (2014). "Evaluation of patients' quality of life aspects after cardiac pacemaker implantation". Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery, 29 (1), 37-44.
7. Udo E.O, van Hemel N M, Zuithoff N P, et al (2013). “Long tem quality – of – life in patients with bradycardia pacemaker implantation”. Internationnal Journal of cardiology, 168 (3), 2159 – 2163.
8. Stofmeel M.A, Post W, Kelder JC, et al (2001). “Changes in quality – of – life after pacermaker implantation: Responsiveness of the Aquarel questionnaire”. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 24 (3), 288