ROBOT - ASSISTED RADICAL NEPHRECTOMY IN THE TREATMENT OF RENAL CELL CARCINOMA: OUR STEP-BY-STEP TECHNICAL TO IMPROVE SURGEON SKILLS, EXPERIENCE THROUGH 25 CASES AT BINH DANG HOSPITAL

Luông Nguyễn Hoàng, Hưng Trần Vĩnh

Main Article Content

Abstract

Introduction: To evaluate and analyze the experience of robot - assisted radical nephrectomy in the treatment of renal cell carcinoma, step - by - step technical procedures to improve the skills of surgeons at Binh Dan Hospital. Patients and methods: Our study describe a series of cases, we selected all patients with solid kidney tumors diagnosed by CT scan or MRI of the urinary system at Binh Dan Hospital who underwent robot - assisted radical nephrectomy from December 2023 to October 2024 according to step - by - step technical procedures. Results: Recorded 25 patients (14 men, 11 women, male/female ratio: 1.3/1, average age 59.5 years; range from 35 to 70) underwent robot - assisted radical nephrectomy. Kidney tumors were located on the left side in 13 cases (52%), on the right side in 12 cases (48%). The size of the kidney tumor is 74 ± 39mm, including 5 cases of stage cT1N0M0 (20%), 18 cases of stage cT2N0-1M0 (72%), 2 cases of stage cT3aN0M0 (8%). The average surgery time is 132 minutes. Estimated amount of blood loss is 88ml. Cases requiring blood transfusion: 0 cases. Major complications (Clavien ≥ 3) were absent. Hospital stay about 2.9 days. Post - operative pathology of 25 cases of renal cell carcinoma includes: 18 cases of clear cell type (72%), 5 cases of papillary type (20%) and 2 cases of chromophobe cells (4%). Conclusion: This study were 25 patients with localized renal cell carcinoma, including cases with tumor thrombus in the renal vein; robot - assisted radical nephrectomy was performed within an acceptable surgical time frame, feasible, and safe without significant complications.

Article Details

References

1. Ljungberg B, Bex A, Albiges L et al, "EAU Guidelines on Renal Cell Carcinoma", European Association of Urology, Limited Update March 2024.
2. Motzer RJ, Jonasch E, Agarwa N et al, "NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology: Kidney Cancer", National Comprehensive Cancer Network, Version 1, 2025.
3. Klingler DW, Hemstreet GP, Balaji KC et al, "Feasibility of robotic radical nephrectomy initial results of single-institution pilot study", J Urology, 65, 2005, pp. 1086 - 1089.
4. Abaza R, "Robotic Radical Nephrectomy", Robotic Surgery, Springer International Publishing AG 2018, pp. 71 - 77. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-65864-3.
5. Jeong IG, Khandwala YS, Kim JH, et al, "Association of robotic-assisted vs laparoscopic radical nephrectomy with perioperative outcomes and health care costs", JAMA, 318, 2017,
pp. 1561 - 1568.
6. Helmers MR, Ball MW, Gorin MA et al, "Expand Robotic versus laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: comparative analysis and cost considerations", Can J Urology, 23(5), 2016,
pp. 8435 - 8440.
7. Anele UA, Marchioni M, Yang B et al, "Robotic versus laparoscopic radical nephrectomy: a large multi- institutional analysis", World J Urol, 37(11), 2019, pp. 2439 – 2450. doi: 10.1007/ s00345-019-02657-2.
8. Davila HH., Storey RE., Rose MC. et al, "Robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical nephrectomy using the Da Vinci Si system: how to improve surgeon autonomy. Our step-by-step technique", J Robotic Surg, 10, 2016, pp . 285 – 288. DOI 10.1007/s11701-016-0608-6.
9. Stout TE, Gellhaus PT et al, "Robotic Partial vs Radical Nephrectomy for Clinical T3a Tumors: A Narrative Review", Journal Of Endourology, Volume 37, Number 9 (2023), pp. 978 – 985. doi: 10.1089/end.2023.0173.