CHANGES IN INTRAOCULAR PRESSURE INDEX AFTER RELEX SMILE SURGERY IN PATIENTS WITH THICK CORNEAL THICKNESS

Như Hân Trương, Ngọc Đông Phạm, Trọng Dũng Phan

Main Article Content

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the change in intraocular pressure after ReLEX SMILE surgery in patients with thick corneal thickness. Materials and methods: The study was conducted on 40 eyes of 20 myopia – astigmatism patients treated by the ReLEX SMILE method at the National Eye Hospital from March 2020 to October 2020, designed as a prospective, clinically descriptive study without a control group. Results: The average age of the study group was 19.9±2.8 years old, visual acuity at all the time of post-operative evaluation was >20/30; The average corneal thickness before surgery was 575.1± 25mm, 3 months after surgery was 499.5±28mm; 50% of patients had an average preoperative spherical equilalent (-3.25D - -6D). Intraocular pressure before surgery was 16.35 ± 2.53 mmHg, after surgery 3 months it was 10.5 ± 2.1 mmHg. The difference in intraocular pressure between 1 week and 1 month compared to that before surgery is significant difference with p<0.001.Conclusion:The average intraocular pressure after ReLEX Smile surgery decreased compared to the preoperative intraocular pressure level, which is closely related to the equivalent spherical refraction, the amount of corneal tissue removed and the thickness of the remaining cornea.Therefore, close monitoring of patients after refractive surgery, including periodic checking of intraocular pressure, is extremly important in assessing ocular function. It is necessary to closely evaluate the patient's history to screen and evaluate the glaucoma disease.

Article Details

References

TÀI LIỆU THAM KHẢO
1. Hồ Đoàn Thanh Nhất. Khảo Sát Sự Thay Đổi Chất Lượng Thị Giác Trước và Sau Phẫu Thuật SMILE. Đại học Y dược TP.HCM; 2019.
2. Pidro A, Biscevic A, Pjano MA, Mravicic I, Bejdic N, Bohac M. Excimer Lasers in Refractive Surgery. Acta Inform Medica. 2019;27(4):278-283. doi:10.5455/aim.2019.27.278-283
3. Sutton G, Hodge C. Accuracy and Precision of LASIK Flap Thickness Using the IntraLase Femtosecond Laser in 1000 Consecutive Cases. J Refract Surg Thorofare NJ 1995. 2008;24:802-806. doi:10.3928/1081597X-20081001-06
4. Agarwal A, Agarwal A, Jacob S. Refractive surgery. 2nd ed. New Delhi: Jaypee Brothers Publishers, 2009; p. 152–154.
5. Jin Y, Wang Y, Xu L, et al. Comparison of the Optical Quality between Small Incision Lenticule Extraction and Femtosecond Laser LASIK. J Ophthalmol. 2016;2016:2507973.
6. Lin F, Xu Y, Yang Y. Comparison of the visual results after SMILE and femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK for myopia. J Refract Surg Thorofare NJ 1995. 2014;30(4):248-254.
7. Vestergaard AH, Grauslund J, Ivarsen AR, Hjortdal JØ. Efficacy, safety, predictability, contrast sensitivity, and aberrations after femtosecond laser lenticule extraction. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2014;40(3):403-411.
8. Ajazaj V, Kaçaniku G, Asani M, Shabani A, Dida E. Intraocular Pressure After Corneal Refractive Surgery. Med Arch. 2018;72(5):341-343. doi:10.5455/medarh.2018.72.341-343