COMPARISON OF SUVmax BEETWEN PRIMARY TUMOR AND METASTASIS LESIONS IN NON SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER

Huy Huỳnh Quang

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To compare the SUVmax of primary tumor and metastasis lesions in NSCLC. Patient and method: Patients dignosed with non small cell lung cancer based on pathology results were retrospective analyzed at Oncology and Nuclear Medicine Department - Bach Mai Hospital, from November 2015 to October 2018. They were undergone 18F-FDG PET-CT scans before the treatment. The variables include: SUVmax of primary tumor, lung metastases, mediastinal lymph nodes, distant organ metastases. Results: SUVmax of primary tumor were 10.41 ± 3.82 and not different due to tumor location (p> 0.05). SUVmax was highest in liver and abdominal lymph node, respectively 7.53 ± 4.63 and 7.50 ± 3.15; the lowest SUVmax in lung metastases and hilar lymph nodes, respectively 4.41 ± 2.81 and 5.57 ± 2.46. SUVmax was significantly greater for primary tumor than that of regional metastases (mediastinal lymph nodes, hilar lymph nodes, and lung metastases) (p <0.01). SUVmax of the second primary tumor was significantly greater than that for pulmonary metastases (8.17 ± 2.65 vs. 4.41 ± 2.81, p <0.01). SUVmax of primary tumors are significantly greater than SUVmax of distant organ metastases (liver, bone, adrenal gland) (p <0.01). Conclusion: PET/CT is a very good image technique to diagnose NSCLC and differenciate to metastases. Thus, it takes an important part in stagging of NSCLC.


 

Article Details

References

1. Sorensen M, Pijls-Johannesma M, Felip E, et al. (2010). Small-cell lung cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol, 21 Suppl 5: v120-5.
2. American Cancer Society (2006). Cancer Facts and Figures. www.cancer.org.
3. Dijkman BG, Schuurbiers OC, Vriens D, et al. (2010). The role of (18)F-FDG PET in the differentiation between lung metastases and synchronous second primary lung tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 37(11): 2037-47.
4. Huber RT, A (2012). Update on small cell lung cancer management. Breathe, 8(4): 315-330.
5. Inal A, Kucukoner M, Kaplan MA, et al. (2013). Is (18)F-FDG-PET/CT prognostic factor for survival in patients with small cell lung cancer? Single center experience. Rev Port Pneumol, 19(6): 260-5.
6. Šobić-Šaranović D (2012). Role of integrated F-18 fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography in evaluation of lung cancer. Arch Oncol, 20(3-4): 107-111.
7. Park SB, Choi JY, Moon SH, et al. (2014). Prognostic value of volumetric metabolic parameters measured by [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with small cell lung cancer. Cancer Imaging, 14: 2.
8. Oh JR, Seo JH, Chong A, et al. (2012). Whole-body metabolic tumour volume of 18F-FDG PET/CT improves the prediction of prognosis in small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 39(6): 925-35.
9. Nieder C, Grosu AL, Marienhagen K, et al. (2012). Non-small cell lung cancer histological subtype has prognostic impact in patients with brain metastases. Med Oncol, 29(4): 2664-8.