COMPARISON OF SUVmax BEETWEN PRIMARY TUMOR AND METASTASIS LESIONS IN NON SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To compare the SUVmax of primary tumor and metastasis lesions in NSCLC. Patient and method: Patients dignosed with non small cell lung cancer based on pathology results were retrospective analyzed at Oncology and Nuclear Medicine Department - Bach Mai Hospital, from November 2015 to October 2018. They were undergone 18F-FDG PET-CT scans before the treatment. The variables include: SUVmax of primary tumor, lung metastases, mediastinal lymph nodes, distant organ metastases. Results: SUVmax of primary tumor were 10.41 ± 3.82 and not different due to tumor location (p> 0.05). SUVmax was highest in liver and abdominal lymph node, respectively 7.53 ± 4.63 and 7.50 ± 3.15; the lowest SUVmax in lung metastases and hilar lymph nodes, respectively 4.41 ± 2.81 and 5.57 ± 2.46. SUVmax was significantly greater for primary tumor than that of regional metastases (mediastinal lymph nodes, hilar lymph nodes, and lung metastases) (p <0.01). SUVmax of the second primary tumor was significantly greater than that for pulmonary metastases (8.17 ± 2.65 vs. 4.41 ± 2.81, p <0.01). SUVmax of primary tumors are significantly greater than SUVmax of distant organ metastases (liver, bone, adrenal gland) (p <0.01). Conclusion: PET/CT is a very good image technique to diagnose NSCLC and differenciate to metastases. Thus, it takes an important part in stagging of NSCLC.
Article Details
References

2. American Cancer Society (2006). Cancer Facts and Figures. www.cancer.org.

3. Dijkman BG, Schuurbiers OC, Vriens D, et al. (2010). The role of (18)F-FDG PET in the differentiation between lung metastases and synchronous second primary lung tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 37(11): 2037-47.

4. Huber RT, A (2012). Update on small cell lung cancer management. Breathe, 8(4): 315-330.

5. Inal A, Kucukoner M, Kaplan MA, et al. (2013). Is (18)F-FDG-PET/CT prognostic factor for survival in patients with small cell lung cancer? Single center experience. Rev Port Pneumol, 19(6): 260-5.

6. Šobić-Šaranović D (2012). Role of integrated F-18 fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography in evaluation of lung cancer. Arch Oncol, 20(3-4): 107-111.

7. Park SB, Choi JY, Moon SH, et al. (2014). Prognostic value of volumetric metabolic parameters measured by [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with small cell lung cancer. Cancer Imaging, 14: 2.

8. Oh JR, Seo JH, Chong A, et al. (2012). Whole-body metabolic tumour volume of 18F-FDG PET/CT improves the prediction of prognosis in small cell lung cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging, 39(6): 925-35.

9. Nieder C, Grosu AL, Marienhagen K, et al. (2012). Non-small cell lung cancer histological subtype has prognostic impact in patients with brain metastases. Med Oncol, 29(4): 2664-8.
