Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 16/12/2021
Abstract Views: 594
Views PDF: 376
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v507i1.1360
Issue
Vol. 507 No. 1 (2021)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Thị Hải Yến, N. ., Phương Thảo, H. ., Đặng Tú Nguyên, L. ., Hoàng Hải Triều, . B. ., Đình Trung, T. ., Ngọc Danh, L. ., Văn Đạt, T. ., & Văn Vĩnh Châu, N. . (2021). THE SITUATION OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM GUIDELINES OF THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH IN HEALTH FACILITIES IN HO CHI MINH CITY. Vietnam Medical Journal, 507(1). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v507i1.1360

THE SITUATION OF IMPLEMENTATION OF THE MANAGEMENT PROGRAM GUIDELINES OF THE MINISTRY OF HEALTH IN HEALTH FACILITIES IN HO CHI MINH CITY

Nguyễn Thị Hải Yến1,, Huỳnh Phương Thảo2, Lê Đặng Tú Nguyên1, Bạch Hoàng Hải Triều1, Trần Đình Trung3, Lê Ngọc Danh4, Trương Văn Đạt1, Nguyễn Văn Vĩnh Châu4
1 University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City
2 Hospital for Tropical Diseases
3 Danang University of Medical Technology and Pharmacy
4 Department of Health of HCM City

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To survey the implementation of the antimicrobial stewardship program at medical facilities in Ho Chi Minh City by 2020. Subjects and methods: Study cross-sectional descriptive survey of medical facilities in Ho Chi Minh City on antimicrobial stewardship program implementation. Results: The implementation of antimicrobial stewardship program in 57 medical facilities in Ho Chi Minh City was above average with an overall score of 63/100. 48/57 establishments have implemented, of which 47/48 establishments have implemented it according to Decision No. 772/QD-BYT. There is a lack of specialists in epidemiology and information technology. Activities of reporting drug resistance, warning of drug duplicated, and monitoring C.difficile infection rates have not been regularly implemented. Only 1 out of 7 indicators/metrics was implemented by more than 70% of establishments, three indicators/metrics on the rate of switching to oral antibiotics (30%), DOT (40%) and DDD (49%) were considered to be difficult in analysis. Much of the analysis of the new indicators/metrics is manual. Conclusion: Health facilities need to promote autonomy mechanisms to mobilize budget for antibiotic management activities and attract experts. In addition, the regulator needs to give more specific guidance on the evaluation criteria and at the same time need to study and apply information technology to automate the analysis of the criteria.

Article Details

Keywords

implementation of guidelines, antibiotic management program

References

1. N. Van Kinh, “Situation Analysis: Antibiotic Use and Resistance in Vietnam.”
2. T.-H.-Y. Nguyen et al., “Implementation status of antimicrobial stewardship programs in hospitals: A quantitative analysis study in Ho Chi Minh city, Vietnam,” Medpharmres, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 34–39, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/ 10.32895/ UMP.MPR.4.2.5.
3. Chính phủ, “Nghị định 16/2015/NĐ-CP quy định cơ chế tự chủ của đơn vị sự nghiệp công lập,” 2015.
4. Chính phủ, Nghị định số 85/2015/NĐ-CP về cơ chế hoạt động, cơ chế tài chính đối với các đơn vị sự nghiệp y tế công lập và giá dịch vụ khám bệnh, chữa bệnh của các cơ sở khám bệnh, chữa bệnh công lập. 2012.
5. M. Mushtaque, F. Khalid, A. A. Ishaqui, R. Masood, M. B. Maqsood, and I. N. Muhammad, “Hospital Antibiotic Stewardship Programs - Qualitative analysis of numerous hospitals in a developing country,” Infect. Prev. Pract., vol. 1, no. 3, p. 100025, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infpip.2019.100025.