PRELIMINARY RESULTS OF AI APPLICATION IN PREDICTING PRENATAL WEIGHT IN VIET NAM
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: Our research aims to propose the application of AI in improving the accuracy for estimating fetal weight.
Method: This is a cross-sectional analytical study combining the development and comparison of predictive models supported by AI that include 1162 pregnancy women that came for scheduled visit and give birth at Obstetric Department at Vinmec Times City International Hospital. The pregnancy women were chosen based on: age (18 to 35 years old), live singleton pregnancy, Vietnamese, height > 153 cm, and gestational age ≥ 36 weeks. Maternal and fetal parameters are then collected and divided into data and test set. Symbolic regression learning method is applied to our ensemble model which include Operon, XGBoost, LightGBM, FEAT, Hadlock, GP-GOMEA, DSR, and SBP-GP. The performance of each algorithms are then evaluated using test data set and compared the results to the traditional method.
Results: 1162 pregnancy women were selected, and each were collected 9 maternal and fetal variables. MAE, MSE, RMSE, and R2 value of each model were calculated from their performance. Operon model’s MAE was 158.542 grams, RMSE was 205.485 and R2 of 0.538, while Hadlock model’s MAE was 186.98 grams, RMSE was 331.373 and R2 of -0.19.
Conclusion: AI-driven methods, particularly symbolic regression, demonstrates greater accuracy and efficacy compared to the traditional method, hence suggests a promising potential in prenatal weight estimation.
Article Details
Keywords
symbolic regression, fetal weight estimation, ensemble learning, machine learning
References

2. Nguyen XC, Doan QH, Bui TT, Le NQH, Nguyen QM, Dam LC, et al. Khảo sát giá trị các phương pháp ước lượng cân nặng thai nhi đủ tháng | Tạp chí Phụ sản. 2023 Sep 23 [cited 2024 Dec 7];21(3). Available from: https://vjog.vn/journal/article/view/1615

3. Kumari A, Goswami S, Mukherjee P. Comparative Study of Various Methods of Fetal Weight Estimation in Term Pregnancy. J South Asian Fed Obstet Gynaecol. 2013 Apr;5(1):22–5.

4. Marien M, Perron S, Bergeron AM, Singbo N, Demers S. Comparison of the Accuracy of INTERGROWTH-21 and Hadlock Ultrasound Formulae for Fetal Weight Prediction. J Obstet Gynaecol Can JOGC J Obstet Gynecol Can JOGC. 2021 Nov;43(11):1254–9.

5. Ma J, Cheng D, Zhang Z, Cai B, Xu X. Evaluating the accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimations using the Hadlock IV formula in a Chinese population. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023 Jun 1;13(6):3726–34.

6. Saw SN, Lim MC, Liew CN, Ahmad Kamar A, Sulaiman S, Saaid R, et al. The accuracy of international and national fetal growth charts in detecting small-for-gestational-age infants using the Lambda-Mu-Sigma method. Front Surg [Internet]. 2023 Apr 11 [cited 2024 Nov 26];10. Available from: https://www.frontiersin.org/journals/surgery/articles/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1123948/full

7. Schmidt M, Lipson H. Distilling Free-Form Natural Laws from Experimental Data. Science. 2009 Apr 3;324(5923):81–5.

8. Lu Y, Fu X, Chen F, Wong KKL. Prediction of fetal weight at varying gestational age in the absence of ultrasound examination using ensemble learning. Artif Intell Med. 2020 Jan 1;102:101748.
