Article Sidebar

pdf
Date Published: 05/05/2025
Abstract Views: 90
Views pdf: 41
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v549i3.13933
Issue
Vol. 549 No. 3 (2025)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Nguyễn, V., Nguyễn Thị Thu, H., Phạm Thị, T., Nguyễn Thị, H., & Hoàng Minh, T. (2025). SUMMARY RESULTS OF TREATMENT AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS AFTER EXTREME LATERAL INTERBODY FUSION SURGERY AT HANOI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL. Vietnam Medical Journal, 549(3). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v549i3.13933

SUMMARY RESULTS OF TREATMENT AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN PATIENTS WITH LUMBAR SPINAL STENOSIS AFTER EXTREME LATERAL INTERBODY FUSION SURGERY AT HANOI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

Vũ Nguyễn, Huyền Nguyễn Thị Thu, Thúy Phạm Thị, Hiền Nguyễn Thị, Tân Hoàng Minh

Main Article Content

Abstract

Introduction: Extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) is a minimally invasive surgical technique with a small incision, does not cause of transpsoas trauma, so the postoperative recovery time is quick, limiting the disadvantages of open or minimally invasive posterior surgery. Objective: To evaluate   quality of life in patients with spinal stenosis after extreme lateral interbody fusion surgery. Subjects and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 27 patients who underwent XLIF surgery at Hanoi Medical University Hospital from April 2019 to May 2024. Quality of life was assessed using VAS, ODI, JOA and EQ-5D-5L scores. Results: 27 patients included 12 males and 15 females with an average age of 58.81±8.1. The quality of life of patients after surgery was significantly improved based on the back VAS from 7.11±1.31 to 2.81±1.55, leg VAS from 6.81±2.19 to 1.23±1.63, ODI score from 27.8±8.50 to 12.90±7.70, JOA score from 7.63±2.87 to 13.6±1.82, EQ-5D-5L score from 19±3.14 to 11.70±1.98. Conclusion: XLIF surgery significantly improved the level of pain and quality of life of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis

Article Details

Keywords

Spinal stenosis, lateral surgery, XLIF, percutaneous screw, quality of life

References

1. Elowitz E, Yanni D, Chwajol M, Starke R, Perin N. Evaluation of Indirect Decompression of the Lumbar Spinal Canal Following Minimally Invasive Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion: Radiographic and Outcome Analysis. Min - Minim Invasive Neurosurg. 2011;54(05/06):201- 206. doi:10.1055/s-0031-1286334.
2. Goodnough LH, Koltsov J, Wang T, Xiong G, Nathan K, Cheng I. Decreased estimated blood loss in lateral trans-psoas versus anterior approach to lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis. J Spine Surg. 2019;5(2):185-193. doi:10.21037/jss.2019.05.08
3. Hiyama A, Katoh H, Sakai D, Tanaka M, Sato M, Watanabe M. Short-term comparison of preoperative and postoperative pain after indirect decompression surgery and direct decompression surgery in patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis. Scientific Reports. 2020;10(1): 18887. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-76028-y.
4. Malham GM, Ellis NJ, Parker RM, et al. Maintenance of Segmental Lordosis and Disk Height in Stand-alone and Instrumented Extreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF). Clin Spine Surg. 2017;30(2):E90-E98. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182aa4c94
5. Nomura H, Yamashita A, Watanabe T, Shirasawa K. Quantitative analysis of indirect decompression in extreme lateral interbody fusion and posterior spinal fusion with a percutaneous pedicle screw system for lumbar spinal stenosis. J Spine Surg. 2019;5(2):266-272. doi:10.21037/ jss.2019.06.03.
6. Yingsakmongkol W, Jitpakdee K, Kerr S, Limthongkul W, Kotheeranurak V, Singhatanadgige W. Successful Criteria for Indirect Decompression With Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion. Neurospine. 2022;19(3):805-815. doi:10.14245/ns.2244058.029