EVALUATION OF SURGICAL OUTCOMES FOR TREATMENT OF HYDROCEPHALUS WITH CRANIAL DEFECT
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Patients with hydrocephalus and cranial defects require cranioplasty and ventriculoperitoneal shunting, but whether these surgeries should be performed simultaneously or in separate stages remains uncertain. Methods: From August 2020 to October 2022, the Neurosurgery Department I at Viet Duc Friendship Hospital performed surgery on 27 patients with hydrocephalus and cranial defects after traumatic brain injury. Collected data included age, gender, Glasgow Coma Scale scores pre-surgery, 24-hour post-drainage, and 1-month post cranioplasty; as well as post-operative complications. Results: A total of 27 patients were included: 14 underwent both surgeries simultaneously, and 13 underwent the surgeries in two stages. The average age was 39.6 ± 16.6 years, with a male-to-female ratio of 23:4. The average distance from the upper edge of the craniectomy to the midline was 19.35 ± 8.76 mm. Pre-surgery Glasgow Coma Scale score was 9.96 ± 1.53, and post-24-hour drainage score was 10.41 ± 1.74. The average thickness of the epidural hematoma in the simultaneous surgery group was 9.71 mm, while in the two-stage group, it was 4.23 mm. The brain contusion rate was 6/14 in the simultaneous group and 1/13 in the two-stage group. Four patients in the simultaneous surgery group required reoperation. The overall complication rates in the simultaneous and two-stage surgery groups were 9/14 and 2/13, respectively.
Article Details
Keywords
The overall complication rate in the simultaneous surgery group is higher, especially cerebral contusion
References
2. Heo J, Park SQ, Cho SJ, Chang JC, Park HK. Evaluation of simultaneous cranioplasty and ventriculoperitoneal shunt procedures. J Neurosurg. 2014;121(2):313-318. doi:10.3171/ 2014.2.JNS131480
3. Fattahian R, Bagheri SR, Sadeghi M. Development of Posttraumatic Hydrocephalus Requiring Ventriculoperitoneal Shunt After Decompressive Craniectomy for Traumatic Brain Injury: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Retrospective Studies. Med Arch. 2018;72(3):214-219. doi:10.5455/medarh.2018.72.214-219
4. Kurland DB, Khaladj-Ghom A, Stokum JA, et al. Complications Associated with Decompressive Craniectomy: A Systematic Review. Neurocrit Care. 2015;23(2):292-304. doi:10.1007/s12028-015-0144-7
5. Yadav V, Sahu A, Pandey N, Prasad RS, Mishra M, Pradhan RS. A comprehensive study of risk factors predicting hydrocephalus following decompressive craniectomy in traumatic brain injuries. Egypt J Neurosurg. 2024;39(1):57. doi:10.1186/s41984-024-00323-3
6. Iaccarino C, Chibbaro S, Sauvigny T, et al. Consensus-based recommendations for diagnosis and surgical management of cranioplasty and post-traumatic hydrocephalus from a European panel. Brain Spine. 2024;4:102761. doi:10.1016/ j.bas.2024.102761
7. Williams JR, Meyer MR, Ricard JA, et al. Re-examining decompressive craniectomy medial margin distance from midline as a metric for calculating the risk of post-traumatic hydrocephalus. J Clin Neurosci Off J Neurosurg Soc Australas. 2021;87:125-131. doi:10.1016/ j.jocn.2021.02.025
8. Kim JH, Ahn JH, Oh JK, Song JH, Park SW, Chang IB. Factors associated with the development and outcome of hydrocephalus after decompressive craniectomy for traumatic brain injury. Neurosurg Rev. 2021;44(1):471-478. doi:10.1007/s10143-019-01179-0