THE PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF THE PRISM IV SCORING SYSTEM IN MORTALITY PREDICTION FOR CHILDREN ADMITTED TO THE EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT OF CAN THO CHILDEN’S HOSPITAL

Nghĩa Bùi Quang, Huy Hồ Thanh, Linh Dương Mỹ, Sang Nguyễn Phước, Như Trần Thị Huỳnh

Main Article Content

Abstract

Introduction: The mortality prognosis in children with severe illness plays a crucial role in assisting clinicians in making treatment decisions and monitoring outcomes more effectively. Numerous scoring systems are employed in clinical practice for prognostication, including PIM, PELOD, pSOFA,… Notably, the Pediatric Risk of Mortality scoring system, commonly referred to as PRISM, has been developed, refined, and increasingly utilized due to its excellent discrimination and calibration among prognostic tools. Objective: 1. Describe the clinical and paraclinical symptoms of children in the emergency department utilizing the PRISM IV score for mortality prognosis. 2. Determine the prognostic value of the PRISM IV score in predicting mortality for children admitted to the emergency department at Can Tho Children's Hospital. Subjects and Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study with analysis conducted on 103 children aged from 1 month to 15 years who were admitted to the emergency department at Can Tho Children's Hospital from 7/2023 to 1/2025. Results: The majority of children with severe illness were in the age group of 10 to 15 years, with most being hospitalized due to shock; the overall mortality rate was 12,6%, with the shock patient group exhibiting a higher mortality rate. The average PRISM IV score of the study group was 7,67±6,066. The average PRISM IV score for the survivor group was 6,52±4,636, while that of the deceased group was 15,62±8,665. The PRISM IV scoring system had an area under the ROC curve of 0,837 with a 95% confidence interval (0,712-0,962), p<0,001. Conclusion: The application of the PRISM IV scoring system in the emergency department assists physicians in prognosticating the severity of illness, optimizing management, and monitoring patients.

Article Details

References

1. Hoàng Ngọc Anh, Phạm Thị Hương, Đinh Văn Thức, et al (2017), “Đánh giá giá trị của thang điểm PRISM trong tiên lượng nguy cơ tử vong ở trẻ em ngoài giai đoạn sơ sinh tại khoa hồi sức-cấp cứu Bệnh viện trẻ em Hải Phòng”, Tạp chí Nhi khoa, 10(4), pp.33-38.
2. Vaja M., Jain S., Pamecha P., et al (2023), “Comparison of PRISM IV and PIM III prognostic scores as mortality indicators among paediatric intensive care unit patients &nbsp”, Sri Lanka Journal of Child Health, 52(3).
3. Jemmy A. Sutantio, Fendy Matulatan, Edwin Danardono, et al (2020), “Pediatric Logistic Organ Dysfunction-2, Pediatric Risk Of Mortality-IV And Pediatric Index Of Mortality-3 For Predicting Mortality In Pediatric Surgery Patients With Sepsis”, International Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, 12(04).
4. Mohamed M., Abdelatif R., Bakheet M, et al (2023), “Performance of pediatric index of mortality-2, pediatric index of mortality-3 and pediatric risk of mortality IV in an Egyptian pediatric intensive care unit.”, Sohag Medical Journal, 5(4).
5. Garcia P.C., Ronchetti M.R., Da Costa C.A, et al (2018), “Abstract P-340: the pediatric risk of mortality iv validation in an independent sample in southern of brazil”, Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, 19(6S), pp.150-150.
6. Chegini V., Hatamabadi H., Jedari Attaran S, et al (2022), “Evaluating the Ability of PRISM4 and PIM3 to Predict Mortality in Patients Admitted to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit; a Diagnostic Accuracy Study”, Archives of Academic Emergency Medicine, 10(1), pp.e58.
7. Pollack M.M., Holubkov R., Funai T, et al (2016), “The Pediatric Risk of Mortality Score: Update 2015”, Pediatric critical care medicine: a journal of the Society of Critical Care Medicine and the World Federation of Pediatric Intensive and Critical Care Societies, 17(1), pp.2-9.
8. Lubis A.D., Nasution B.B., Lubis A.P, et al (2024), “Role of pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM IV) score at 24 and 72 hours of hospitalization in predicting mortality among critically ill pediatric patients treated in PICU”, Narra J, 4(2), pp.e780.