ANATOMY OF LOWER LIMB VASCULATURE: VARIANTS AND APPLICATION IN RECONSTRUCTION WITH FIBULA FLAP
Main Article Content
Abstract
Backgrounds: Currently, the free fibula flap has become one of the most commonly used materials in reconstructing bone and soft tissue defects. The fibula flap is nourished by the peroneal artery, so a thorough understanding of the vascular anatomy and its variants is important. Patients and methods: This study was conducted on 40 patients who underwent maxillofacial reconstruction with the free fibula flap from May 2023 to August 2024. The age of the patients ranged from 13 to 72 years old, with 55% of them being male and 55% being female. The parameters recorded on preoperative computed tomography angiography of the lower limbs included fibula length, bone and vascular abnormalities, length of truncus tibiofibularis, diameter of truncus tibiofibularis, and diameter of peroneal artery. Results: The mean age of the study cohort was 43.12 ± 17.10 (ranging from 13 to 72). There was no difference in mean age between men and women (p = 0.600). Gender differences were observed in fibula length (p < 0.0001) and diameter of truncus tibiofibularis (p = 0.012). There was no difference between the two legs in fibula length and vascular parameters such as length and diameter of truncus tibiofibularis and diameter of peroneal artery. The frequency of vascular abnormalities in the two legs was similar, and there was no case of type III-C branching, which is an absolute contraindication of fibula flap harvest. Conclusion: CT angiography of the lower limbs with contrast should be routinely performed before fibula flap harvest to detect early vascular abnormalities that may be contraindications of this technique.
Article Details
Keywords
computed tomography angiography, anatomical variants of lower limb vasculature, fibula flap
References


2. Knitschke M, Baumgart AK, Bäcker C, et al. Computed Tomography Angiography (CTA) before Reconstructive Jaw Surgery Using Fibula Free Flap: Retrospective Analysis of Vascular Architecture. Diagn Basel Switz. 2021;11(10): 1865. doi:10.3390/diagnostics11101865


3. Mauro MA, Jaques PF, Moore M. The popliteal artery and its branches: embryologic basis of normal and variant anatomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1988;150(2): 435-437. doi:10.2214/ ajr.150.2.435


4. Futran ND, Stack BC, Payne LP. Use of color Doppler flow imaging for preoperative assessment in fibular osteoseptocutaneous free tissue transfer. Otolaryngol--Head Neck Surg Off J Am Acad Otolaryngol-Head Neck Surg. 1997;117(6): 660-663. doi:10.1016/S0194-59989770049-4


5. Kim D, Orron DE, Skillman JJ. Surgical significance of popliteal arterial variants. A unified angiographic classification. Ann Surg. 1989;210(6): 776-781. doi:10.1097/00000658-198912000-00014


6. Yanik B, Bulbul E, Demirpolat G. Variations of the popliteal artery branching with multidetector CT angiography. Surg Radiol Anat SRA. 2015; 37(3):223-230. doi:10.1007/s00276-014-1346-y


7. Golas AR, Levine JP, Ream J, Rodriguez ED. Aberrant Lower Extremity Arterial Anatomy in Microvascular Free Fibula Flap Candidates: Management Algorithm and Case Presentations. J Craniofac Surg. 2016;27(8):2134-2137. doi:10. 1097/SCS.0000000000003220


8. Ma C, Wang L, Tian Z, et al. Standardize routine angiography assessment of leg vasculatures before fibular flap harvest: lessons of congenital and acquired vascular anomalies undetected by color Doppler and physical examinations. Acta Radiol Stockh Swed 1987. 2021;62(12): 1716-1725. doi:10.1177/ 0284185120980001

