THE VALUE OF COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN DIFFERENTIATING PERITONEAL TUBERCULOSIS AND PERITONEAL CARCINOMATOSIS
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To determine the value of certain computed tomography (CT) imaging features in distinguishing peritoneal tuberculosis (PT) from peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC). Subjects and Methods: This cross-sectional study included 141 patients diagnosed with PT (50 cases) and PC (91 cases), confirmed by histopathological results and ascitic fluid analysis. The CT features that differed between the two groups were analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify independent diagnostic factors distinguishing PT from PC. Results: Significant differences were observed in factors such as ascitic fluid density, types of peritoneal thickening, peritoneal nodules, omental infiltration, omental nodules, omental rim and necrotic lymph nodes. Some features with relatively high diagnostic accuracy for PC included ascitic fluid density (70.8%) and peritoneal thickening pattern (77.4%). Independent diagnostic factors for PC included low-density ascitic fluid, irregular peritoneal thickening, absence of omental infiltration and presence of omental nodules. Conclusion: CT is a highly valuable tool in differentiating PT from PC. Key features suggestive of PC include low-density ascitic fluid, irregular peritoneal thickening, absence of omental infiltration and presence of omental nodules.
Article Details
Keywords
computed tomography, peritoneal tuberculosis, peritoneal carcinomatosis
References
2. Aaron V, Amanda F, MaryAnn W, et al. Peritoneal tuberculosis: the great mimicker. International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer. 2020;30(4):546. doi:10.1136/ijgc-2020-001291.
3. Chen IH, Torng PL, Lee CY, Lee KH, Hsu HC, Cheng WF. Diagnosis of Peritoneal Tuberculosis from Primary Peritoneal Cancer. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18(19): doi:10.3390/ijerph 181910407.
4. Global Tuberculosis Programme. Global tuberculosis report 2019. 2019:284. 978-92-4-156571-4. Accessed 22/04/2023. https://www. who.int/publications/i/item/9789241565714
5. Pang Y, Li Y, Xu D, Sun X, Hou D. Differentiating peritoneal tuberculosis and peritoneal carcinomatosis based on a machine learning model with CT: a multicentre study. Abdominal Radiology. 2023;48(4):1545-1553. doi:10.1007/s00261-022-03749-1. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-022-03749-1
6. Ramanan RV, Venu V. Differentiation of peritoneal tuberculosis from peritoneal carcinomatosis by the Omental Rim sign. A new sign on contrast enhanced multidetector computed tomography. Eur J Radiol. 2019;113 (124-134. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.02.019.
7. Wasnik AP, Maturen KE, Kaza RK, Al-Hawary MM, Francis IR. Primary and secondary disease of the peritoneum and mesentery: review of anatomy and imaging features. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40(3):626-42. doi:10.1007/s00261-014-0232-8.