Article Sidebar

pdf
Date Published: 25/06/2025
Abstract Views: 204
Views pdf: 91
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v551i2.14610
Issue
Vol. 551 No. 2 (2025)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Chu Thị Quỳnh, H. (2025). CLINICAL EVALUATION OF EMAX PRESS CERAMIC INLAYS/ONLAYS IN THE RESTORATION OF POSTERIOR TEETH WITH EXTENSIVE HARD TISSUE LOSS. Vietnam Medical Journal, 551(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v551i2.14610

CLINICAL EVALUATION OF EMAX PRESS CERAMIC INLAYS/ONLAYS IN THE RESTORATION OF POSTERIOR TEETH WITH EXTENSIVE HARD TISSUE LOSS

Hương Chu Thị Quỳnh

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the results of tooth restoration using Emax Press ceramic Inlay/Onlay for posterior teeth at the National Hospital of Odonto - Stomatology - 40B Trang Thi, Hoan Kiem district, Hanoi, Vietnam, 2023-2025. Method: Non-controlled clinical intervention study, evaluating the results according to the before-after model on 37 molars of 25 patients. Data were collected through clinical examination and patient interviews and entered and analyzed on SPSS 20.0 software. Results: The success rate of restoration using Emax Press ceramic inlay/onlay for molars with good results was shown in the integrity of the restoration margin, the tightness after restoration, the durability of the tooth tissue with good results, patient satisfaction, and no recurrent caries after 3 months of follow-up (all achieved 100%). The aesthetic results of the restoration immediately after installation, 1 month and 3 months of both inlay/inlay methods achieved good results (78.4%) and average results (21.6%). Conclusion: Restoration of molars with Emax press porcelain inlay/onlay has very good results immediately after restoration, 1 month and 3 months after restoration on the retention index of the restoration block; tightness; lateral contact, aesthetics, and patient satisfaction. These two types of restorations can be widely applied in clinical practice.

Article Details

Keywords

Restoration, molar crown, Inlay/Onlay, Emax press

References

1. Zhu Z (2015), Effect of Post Placement on the Restoration of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Systematic Review, 475-483, 2015.
2. Hà TTT, Chữa răng và nội nha tập 2: Nội nha lâm sàng, Nhà xuất bản Giáo dục Việt Nam, 2014, 118.
3. Hargreaves KM, Berman LH (2015), Restoration of the Endodontically treated tooth," in Cohen's Pathways of the Pulp, 818-848.
4. Elrashid AH, Alkahtani AH, Alqahtani SJ (2019), Stereomicroscopic Evaluation of Marginal Fit of E.Max Press and E.Max Computer-Aided Design and Computer-Assisted Manufacturing Lithium Disilicate Ceramic Crowns: An In vitro Study. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent, 9(2):178-184.
5. Barghi N; Berry T (2002), Clinical evaluation of etched porcelain onlays: a 4-year report. Compend Contin Educ Dent, 23(7):657-60, 662, 664.
6. Frankenberger R, Lohbauer U, Schaible RB, et al (2008), Luting of ceramic inlays in vitro: marginal quality of self–etch and etch–and–rinse adhesives versus self–etch cements. Dent Mater, 24(2):185–191.
7. Frankenberger R, Taschner M, Garcia–Godoy F, et al (2008), Leucite–reinforced glass ceramic inlays and Onlays after 12 years. J Adhes Dent, 10(5):393–398.
8. Kramer N, Ebert J, Petschelt A, et al (2006), Ceramic Inlays bonded with two adhesives after 4 years. Dent Mater, 22(1):13–21.
9. Barone A, Derchi G, Rossi A, et al (2008). Longitudinal clinical evaluation of bonded composite inlays: a 3–year study. Quintessence Int, 39(1):65–71.
10. Manhart J, Fuchsbrunner SA, Chen HY, et al. A 2–year clinical study of composite and ceramic inlays. Clin Oral Investig. 2000;4(4):192–198.