PRE- AND POST-OPERATIVE AUDIOGRAM ASSESSMENT OF RADICAL MASTOIDECTOMY WITH TYPE IV TYMPANOPLASTY ACCORDING TO WULLSTEIN CLASSIFICATION

Uyên Nguyễn Thị Tố, Nga Nguyễn Thúy, Kỳ Lê Minh

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: Is radical mastoidectomy with type IV tympanoplasty of Wullstein classification effective in preserving hearing? Research method: A descriptive case series with convenience sampling. Study subjects: 27 ears affected by cholesteatoma otitis media underwent radical mastoidectomy combined with type IV tympanoplasty were followed up for at least 6 months postoperatively. Results: The mean age was 42.3±14.7 years, the mean postoperative follow-up time was 22.7 months (ranging from 6 to 87 months). After surgery, there were 14 cases of conductive hearing loss and 15 cases of mixed hearing loss, with no cases of sensorineural hearing loss; compared to preoperative results, while conductive hearing loss increased by 2 cases and mixed hearing loss decreased by 2 cases. The bone hearing threshold, ABG and PTA after surgery were nearly unchanged compared to preoperative values, recorded at 17.3±8.5 dB; 31.1±11.0 dB and 48.7±14.7 dB, respectively. Conclusion: Although, ossiculoplasty was not performed, type IV tympanoplasty of Wullstein on radical mastoidectomy still produced satisfactory hearing outcomes.

Article Details

References

1. Lương Hồng Châu, Đánh giá kết quả tạo hình hòm nhĩ nhỏ cho bệnh nhân đã mổ tiệt căn xương chũm tại Bệnh viện Tai Mũi Họng Trung ương. Journal of 108 - Clinical Medicine and Phamarcy. 2010, Tập 5- Số 3.
2. Cao Minh Thành, Nghiên cứu đặc điểm lâm sàng viêm tai giữa mạn tính tổn thương xương con và đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật tạo hình xương con. Luận án tiến sĩ y học, Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội. 2008.
3. Nguyễn Thị Tố Uyên, Đánh giá kết quả nội soi tiệt căn xương chũm đường trong ống tai ở bệnh nhân viêm tai giữa mạn tính nguy hiểm, Luận án tiến sĩ Y học, Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội. 2018. Trang 84, 127.
4. Bruce Proctor MD, Type 4 tympanoplasty: A Critical review of 122 cases, Otologic. 1964, Vol 79, Feb. 84-89.
5. Hiroaki Yazama, Tasuku Watanabe, Kazunori Fujiwara and Hiromi Takeuchi, Factors Affecting Postoperative Hearing Results in Type IV Tympanoplasty: Preliminary, Study of the Influence of External Auditory Canal Packing Material. Yonago Acta Medica. 2020;63(4):313–318 doi: 10.33160/yam.2020.11.014
6. Lailach S, Zahnert T, Lasurashvili N, Kemper M, Beleites T, Neudert M, Hearing outcome after sequential cholesteatoma surgery. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Aug; 273(8):2035-46. doi:10.1007/s00405-015-3767-6
7. Paul Merkus, Pieter Kemp, Fuat Ziylan, Matthew Yung, Classifications of Mastoid and Middle Ear Surgery: A Scoping Review, J Int Adv Otol. 2018 Aug 3;14(2): 227–232.
8. Saumil N. Merchant MD, Michael E. Ravicz MS, Jonh J. Rosowski PHD, Mechanics of type IV tympanoplasty: experimental findings and surgical implications. Ann Otol Rhinoi Laryngol. 1997, 106: 49-60