OUTCOMES OF IMMEDIATE IMPLANT PLACEMENT USING DIGITAL SURGICAL GUIDE IN THE ESTHETIC ZONE IN ADULT PATIENTS

Dư Lự Văn, Thắng Nguyễn Phú, Huỳnh Vũ Xuân

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To describe the clinical characteristics and implant outcomes in patients with missing teeth in the esthetic zone who underwent immediate implant placement with bone grafting, connective tissue grafting, and the use of a surgical guide at the Institute of Odonto-Stomatology from 2024 to 2025. Subjects and Methods: A descriptive case series was conducted on teeth indicated for immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone, ranging from the second premolar on the right to the second premolar on the left in both jaws. The study was performed at the clinical facilities of the Institute of Odonto-Stomatology from June 2024 to April 2025. Results: The mean width of keratinized gingiva was 4.4 ± 1.0 mm. The mean angular deviation of implant placement was 1.93 ± 0.85°, with coronal and apical deviations of 0.76 ± 0.40 mm and 0.91 ± 0.40 mm, respectively. All spatial deviations were within 1.5 mm. Conclusion: Immediate implant placement in the esthetic zone using a surgical guide allows optimal implant positioning and minimizes placement deviations.

Article Details

References

1. Đàm Văn Việt. Nghiên cứu điều trị mất răng hàm trên từng phần bằng kỹ thuật Implant có ghép xương. Luận văn Thạc sĩ y học. Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội; 2013.
2. Ten Heggeler JM a. G, Slot DE, Van der Weijden GA. Effect of socket preservation therapies following tooth extraction in non-molar regions in humans: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2011;22(8):779-788.
3. Kowalski J, Lapinska B, Nissan J, Lukomska-Szymanska M. Factors Influencing Marginal Bone Loss around Dental Implants: A Narrative Review. Coatings. 2021;11(7):865.
4. Abraham S, Deepak KT, Ambili R, Preeja C, Archana V. Gingival biotype and its clinical significance – A review. Saudi J Dent Res. 2014;5(1):3-7.
5. Sarma M, Shenoy N, Bhandary R. Gingival Biotype: A Secret for Esthetic Success. J Health Allied Sci NU. 2022;12(01):13-17.
6. Tô Nhật Minh. Kết quả cấy ghép Implant tức thì vùng răng sau có sử dụng kỹ thuật ghép xương hai vùng với máng hướng dẫn phẫu thuật. Luận văn Thạc sĩ y học. Trường Đại học Y Hà Nội; 2022.
7. Zhou W, Liu Z, Song L, Kuo C ling, Shafer DM. Clinical Factors Affecting the Accuracy of Guided Implant Surgery—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2018;18(1):28-40.
8. Tahmaseb A, Wu V, Wismeijer D, Coucke W, Evans C. The accuracy of static computer‐aided implant surgery: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2018;29(S16):416-435.
9. Nagi M. Accuracy of implant placement using three different surgical guides. Egypt Dent J. 2018; 64(4):3713-3721.
10. Arısan V, Karabuda CZ, Özdemir T. Implant surgery using bone‐ and mucosa‐supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: surgical and post‐operative outcomes of computer‐aided vs. standard techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2010;21(9):980-988.