EVALUATION QUALITY OF SLEEPING IN PATIENTS AFTER CRANIOTOMY AT HANOI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: Evaluation of sleep quality outcomes in patients after craniotomy at hanoi medical university hospital. Method: Descriptive study of patients undergoing craniotomy at Ha Noi University Hospital 01/2024 to 01/2025. Results: The mean age was 55.2 ± 12.8 years, the proportion of men was 58.8% and women was 41.2%, brain tumor surgery (45%), traumatic brain injury surgery (30%), cerebral hemorrhage surgery (25%), the mean postoperative time was 5.7 ± 2.3 days, the mean total Pittsburgh quality sleeping Index (PSQI) score of the study group was 8.2 ± 3.5, the proportion of patients with poor sleep quality (PSQI > 5) was 75%, high pain level had a 3.05 times higher risk of poor sleep quality than the group with low pain level (OR = 3.05; 95% CI: 1.07 – 8.69; p = 0.037), high Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) anxiety score had a nearly 4 times higher risk of poor sleep quality than the low HADS group (OR = 3.92; 95% CI: 1.07 – 8.69; p = 0.037), high HADS anxiety score had a nearly 4 times higher risk of poor sleep quality than the low HADS-A group (OR = 3.92; 95% CI: 1.07 – 8.69; p = 0.037). 95% CI: 1.32 – 11.61; p = 0.014), there was no statistically significant association between poor sleep and: Age, gender, postoperation 3 days. Conclusions: Quality of sleeping after craniotomy is generally poor, and pain and anxiety factors need to be addressed to improve sleep.
Article Details
Keywords
Quality of sleeping, Pittsburgh quality sleeping Index, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - HADS
References
2. Büttner-Teleagă A, Kim YT, Osel T, Richter K. Sleep Disorders in Cancer-A Systematic Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111696.
3. Government A. Brain cancer in Australia statistics (2021)
4. Welfare AIoHa. Cancer Data in Australia Australian Government (2020) [updated 08 June 2021.
5. Stenberg U, Ruland CM, Miaskowski C. Review of the literature on the effects of caring for a patient with cancer. Psycho-Oncol. 2010; 19(10):1013–25. doi: 10.1002/pon.1670.