CHARACTERISTICS OF MECHANICAL VENTILATION AND TREATMENT OUTCOMES IN PATIENTS WITH MODERATE TO SEVERE ARDS
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) have a high mortality rate, posing a clinical challenge. In Vietnam, there are still limitations in detailed studies describing the characteristics of mechanical ventilation in ARDS patients, especially among those with moderate to severe levels. Objectives: To describe the characteristics of mechanical ventilation and treatment outcomes for patients with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome treated in Critical care Department of Chợ Rẫy Hospital. Methods: This is a prospective observational study. Inclusion criteria included patients diagnosed with moderate to severe ARDS according to the Berlin definition of 2012, who required invasive mechanical ventilation and were admitted to the Critical care Department of Chợ Rẫy Hospital. Results: Patients with ARDS were set with a median PEEP level of 10 (8 – 10) cmH2O, and a median FiO2 of 60 (51.5 – 80) %. The mean plateau pressure (Pplat) was 26.4 ± 3.25 cmH2O. The median respiratory system compliance (Crs) was 23.8 (19.7 – 27.7) mL/cmH2O. The longest hospital stay was 68 days, while the shortest was 4 days. The median duration of Critical care Department stay was 13.5 (10 – 21) days, with a minimum of 4 days and a maximum of 30 days. The median duration of mechanical ventilation was 12 (8.25 – 19.5) days, ranging from 4 to 30 days. Out of 46 patients, 15 (32.6%) died in the Critical care Department, and 3 (6.5%) died outside the Critical care Department. The total in-hospital mortality rate was 18/46 (39.1%). Conclusions: Patients with moderate to severe ARDS were primarily set with high PEEP levels. The overall mortality rate in this group of patients was 32.6%.
Article Details
Keywords
ARDS, mechanical ventilation, treatment outcomes
References
2. Dương Đức Mạnh, Ngô Trọng Toàn, Nguyễn Công Tấn và cộng sự. Đánh giá vai trò của kỹ thuật đo áp lực thực quản trong lựa chọn mức PEEP ở người bệnh ARDS. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2016; 449 (2):151-155.
3. Beitler JR, Sarge T, Banner-Goodspeed VM, et al. Effect of Titrating Positive End-Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) With an Esophageal Pressure–Guided Strategy vs an Empirical High PEEP-Fio2 Strategy on Death and Days Free From Mechanical Ventilation Among Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019; 321(9): 846-857.
4. Bellani G, Laffey JG, Pham T, et al. Epidemiology, Patterns of Care, and Mortality for Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Intensive Care Units in 50 Countries. JAMA. 2016; 315(8): 788-800.
5. Chen L, Grieco DL, Beloncle F, et al. Partition of respiratory mechanics in patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome and association with outcome: a multicentre clinical study. Intensive Care Medicine. 2022; 48(7): 888-898.
6. Huang X, Zhang R, Fan G, et al. Incidence and outcomes of acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care units of mainland China: a multicentre prospective longitudinal study. Crit Care. 2020; 24(1): 515.
7. Matthay MA, Arabi Y, Arroliga AC, et al. A New Global Definition of Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2024; 209(1): 37-47.
8. Mauri T. Personalized Positive End-Expiratory Pressure and Tidal Volume in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: Bedside Physiology-Based Approach. Crit Care Explor. 2021; 3(7): e0486.
9. Talmor D, Sarge T, Malhotra A, et al. Mechanical ventilation guided by esophageal pressure in acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2008; 359(20): 2095-2104.