RESULTS ULNAR NERVE REPAIR INWRIST INJURIES
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was todescribe the clinical characteristics and evaluate the treatment results ulnar nerve repair in wrist injuries. Subjects and methods: The case series descriptive study of 24 patients with 24 ulnar nerves. Results: Including 21 males and 3 females, average age of 41.67 years (range:18-82 years). The most frequent mechanisms of injury were accidental glass lacerations 16/24 (66.67%), knife wounds 6/24 (25%), others 2/24 (8.33%).The most frequently injured structure with ulnar nerve was flexor carpi ulnaris 24/24(100%). Combined flexor carpi ulnaris, ulnar nerve, ulnar artery (ulnar triad) injuries occurred in 18/24 (75%), combined ulnar nerve and median nerve injuries occurred in 12/24 (50%). Group fascicular repair was used in all patients. Follow up was performed for at least 6 months, with average of 16 months. Good sensory and motor recovery were reported respectively in 16/24(66.67%) and 14/24 (58.33%). Conclusion: Because ulnar nerve injuries in wrist were mainly caused by sharp objects, the wounds weren’t crushed, but complicated with many injurred structures. Therefore, it was necessary to examine and evaluate carefully to avoid missing injuries. End to end group fascular repair in cases without nerve defect was still the most effective method .
Article Details
Keywords
Ulnar nerve injury, wrist injury
References
2. Ruijs ACJ, Jaquet J-B, Kalmijn S, Giele H, Hovius SER. Median and Ulnar Nerve Injuries: A Meta-Analysis of Predictors of Motor and Sensory Recovery after Modern Microsurgical Nerve Repair: Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116(2):484-494. doi:10.1097/01.prs.0000172896.86594.07
3. Kokkalis ZT, Efstathopoulos DG, Papanastassiou ID, Sarlikiotis T, Papagelopoulos PJ. Ulnar nerve injuries in guyon canal: A report of 32 cases: Ulnar Nerve Repair in Guyon Canal. Microsurgery. 2012;32(4):296-302. doi:10.1002/micr.21951
4. S E Mackinnon. New directions in peripheral nerve surgery. Ann Plast Surg. 1989;22(3):257-273. doi:10.1097/00000637-198903000-00013
5. Lee SK, Wolfe SW. Peripheral Nerve Injury and Repair. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8(4):10.
6. M G Orgel. Epineurial versus perineurial repair of peripheral nerves. Clin Plast Surg. 1984;4:101-105.
7. Rowshan K, Jones NF, Gupta R. Current surgical techniques of peripheral nerve repair. Oper Tech Orthop. 2004;14(3):163-170. doi:10.1053/j.oto.2004.06.006
8. Kato H, Minami A, Kobayashi M, Takahara M, Ogino T. Functional results of low median and ulnar nerve repair with intraneural fascicular dissection and electrical fascicular orientation. J Hand Surg. 1998;23(3):471-482. doi:10.1016/ S0363-5023(05)80465-4