COMPARISON OF DIRECT AND INDIRECT LDL-CHOLESTEROL QUANTIFICATION METHODS IN PATIENTS WITH TRIGLYCERIDES ≤ 4.5 MMOL/L: EFFICACY OF INDIRECT FORMULAS AT QUOC ANH GENERAL HOSPITAL

Hà Bùi Thị Ngọc, Loan Phạm Thị, Thoa Nguyễn Phương

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: This study to evaluate the characteristics of dyslipidemia and the correlation between directly measured LDL-Cholesterol (LDL-C) and LDL-C estimated by indirect formulas (Friedewald, de Cordova, Anandaraja) in patients with triglyceride (TG) levels ≤ 4,5 mmol/L. Subjects and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on test samples and medical records of 1.352 patients visiting Quoc Anh General Hospital in 2023, divided into Group I (TG ≤ 3,37 mmol/L) and Group II (3,37 < TG ≤ 4,50 mmol/L). LDL-C was measured directly using the AU640 analyzer and estimated using three indirect formulas (Friedewald, de Cordova, Anandaraja). Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was used to assess the correlation between methods. Results: The prevalence of dyslipidemia progressively increased with rising triglyceride concentrations, with LDL-C levels ≥ 3,4 mmol/L observed in 35,5% of Group I and 39,7% of Group II. The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) between directly measured and indirectly estimated LDL-C was notably high in Group I (de Cordova: r = 0,882) and comparatively lower in Group II (Friedewald: r = 0,651). Conclusion: The de Cordova formula is optimal when triglyceride levels are ≤ 3,37 mmol/L, while the Friedewald formula is suitable for TG levels between 3,37 and 4,50 mmol/L. Indirect formulas can serve as alternatives to direct measurement in patients with TG ≤ 4,5 mmol/L, helping to reduce testing costs.

Article Details

References

1. Grundy SM, Stone NJ, Bailey AL, Beam C, Birtcher KK, Blumenthal RS, et al. 1 AHA/ACC Guideline on the Management of Blood Cholesterol. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Jun 25;73(24):e285–350.
2. Lipsy RJ. The National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines. J Manag Care Pharm JMCP. 2003;9(1 Suppl):2–5.
3. de Cordova CMM, de Cordova MM. A new accurate, simple formula for LDL-cholesterol estimation based on directly measured blood lipids from a large cohort. Ann Clin Biochem. 2013 Jan;50(Pt 1):13–9.
4. Anandaraja S, Narang R, Godeswar R, Laksmy R, Talwar KK. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation by a new formula in Indian population. Int J Cardiol. 2005 Jun 22;102(1):117–20.
5. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972 Jun;18(6):499–502.
6. Wang X, Magkos F, Mittendorfer B. Sex differences in lipid and lipoprotein metabolism: it’s not just about sex hormones. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Apr;96(4):885–93.
7. Miller M, Stone NJ, Ballantyne C, Bittner V, Criqui MH, Ginsberg HN, et al. Triglycerides and cardiovascular disease: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2011 May 24;123(20):2292–333.
8. Tremblay AJ, Morrissette H, Gagné JM, Bergeron J, Gagné C, Couture P. Validation of the Friedewald formula for the determination of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol compared with beta-quantification in a large population. Clin Biochem. 2004 Sep;37(9):785–90.
9. Gupta S, Verma M, Singh K. Does LDL-C Estimation Using Anandaraja’s Formula Give a Better Agreement with Direct LDL-C Estimation than the Friedewald’s Formula? Indian J Clin Biochem. 2012 Apr;27(2):127–33.