ASSESS EXERCISE CAPACITY BY ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHIC STRESS TEST IN PATIENTS WITH SINUS BRADYCARDIA
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objectives: Assess exercise capacity by electrocardiographic stress test in patients with sinus bradycardia and investigate some factors related to exercise capacity in this group of patients. Methods: The study was conducted at the Vietnam Heart Hospital and Hanoi Heart Hospital from January 2020 to September 2021. 60 patients with sinus bradycardia less than 50 beats/min as shown on resting surface electrocardiogram were included in the study. The patients enrolled in the study were evaluated clinical, subclinical, and evaluated for exercise capacity by electrocardiographic stress testing. Results: The mean age of the study group was 55.12±13.89 years old. Male/Female ratio: 1.50/1. Patients in the study had a maximum exercise capacity of 7.78±3.59 METs. The mean heart rate at maximum exertion was 129.90±29.22 beats per min. The mean heart rate recovery after exercises 1 minute was 27.72±16.72 beats per min. The Chronotropic index (CI) was 0.64±0.25. The systolic and diastolic blood pressures at maximum exertion were respectively155.31±20.42 mmHg and 88.13±9.13 mmHg. The rate of failure to achieve 85% of the predicted maximum exercise capacity was 53.3%. There were 53.3% patients who had chronotropic incompetence (CI<0.8). Multi linear regression analysis showed that the factors of age, gender, and bradyarrhythmia were strongly correlated with the patient's exercise capacity. The analyzation of data to yield the equation: Maximum exercise capacity (METs) = 18.857 – 0.637 x Age (years) – 0.238 x Gender (Male = 0; Female = 1) – 2,696 x Bradycardia and Conduction Disorders. (R2 = 0.793; p < 0.001).
Article Details
Keywords
Exercise capacity, Electrocardiogram stress test, Sinus bradycardia
References
2. Fred M. Kusumoto, Mark H. Schoenfeld, Coletta Barrett, et al. 2018 ACC/AHA/HRS Guideline on the Evaluation and Management of Patients With Bradycardia and Cardiac Conduction Delay. Circulation. 2019;140:e382–e482.
3. Jensen PN, Gronroos NN, Chen LY, et al. Incidence of and risk factors for sick sinus syndrome in the general population. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64(6): 531–538.
4. Semelka M, Gera J Fau - Usman S, Usman S. Sick sinus syndrome: a review. Am Fam Physician. 2013;87(10):691-6.
5. Kodama S, Saito K Fau - Tanaka S, Tanaka S Fau - Maki M, et al. Cardiorespiratory fitness as a quantitative predictor of all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events in healthy men and women: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2009;301(19):2024-35.
6. Eiran Z Gorodeski, Hemant Ishwaran, Eugene H Blackstone, Michael S Lauer. Quantitative electrocardiographic measures and long-term mortality in exercise test patients with clinically normal resting electrocardiograms. Am Heart J. 2009 Jul;158(1):61-70.e1.
7. Ellestad MH. Chronotropic incompetence. The implications of heart rate response to exercise (compensatory parasympathetic hyperactivity?). Circulation. 1996 Apr 15;93(8):1485-7.
8. Chen MS, Blackstone Eh Fau - Pothier CE, Pothier Ce Fau - Lauer MS, Lauer MS. Heart rate recovery and impact of myocardial revascularization on long-term mortality. Circulation. 2004;110:2851–2857.