QUANTITATIVE TESTING OF LDL-CHOLESTEROL LEVELS: EFFECTIVENESS OF ESTIMATION FORMULAS IN PATIENTS WITH HIGH TRIGLYCERIDES
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to assess the characteristics of dyslipidemia and the correlation between directly measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) and LDL-C estimated using indirect formulas (Friedewald, de Cordova, Anandaraja and Sampson) in patients with triglyceride (TG) levels exceeding 4,5 mmol/L. Subjects and Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on laboratory samples and medical records of 801 patients who visited Quoc Anh General Hospital in 2023. Participants were divided into two groups: Group IIIA (4,50 < TG ≤ 7,0 mmol/L) and Group IIIB (7,0 < TG ≤ 15,0 mmol/L). LDL-C was measured directly using the AU640 analyzer and estimated by four indirect formulas (Friedewald, de Cordova, Sampson and Anandaraja). Pearson’s correlation coefficient (r) was employed to evaluate the correlation between the methods. Results: The correlation coefficient rrr between directly and indirectly measured LDL-C is low. All four formulas yield a correlation coefficient r<0,5 in groups IIIA and IIIB. Specifically, the correlation coefficients between direct measurement and the Friedewald, de Cordova, Anandaraja and Sampson formulas in group IIIA are 0,360; 0.366; 0,404, and 0,364, respectively, while in group IIIB, they are 0,280; 0.416; 0,270 and 0,307, respectively. Conclusion: Indirect formulas lack reliability when TG levels exceed 4,5 mmol/L. The direct measurement method should be utilized to ensure accuracy.
Article Details
Keywords
Triglyceride, LDL-cholesterol, direct LDL-cholesterol quantification, indirect LDL-cholesterol quantification, de Cordova formula, Anandaraja formula, Friedewald, Sampson.
References
2. Nauck M, Warnick GR, Rifai N. Methods for measurement of LDL-cholesterol: a critical assessment of direct measurement by homogeneous assays versus calculation. Clin Chem. 2002 Feb;48(2):236–54.
3. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS. Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972 Jun;18(6):499–502.
4. Martin SS, Blaha MJ, Elshazly MB, Brinton EA, Toth PP, McEvoy JW, et al. Friedewald-estimated versus directly measured low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and treatment implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Aug 20;62(8):732–9.
5. de Cordova CMM, de Cordova MM. A new accurate, simple formula for LDL-cholesterol estimation based on directly measured blood lipids from a large cohort. Ann Clin Biochem. 2013 Jan;50(Pt 1):13–9.
6. Anandaraja S, Narang R, Godeswar R, Laksmy R, Talwar KK. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol estimation by a new formula in Indian population. Int J Cardiol. 2005 Jun 22;102(1):117–20.
7. Sampson M, Ling C, Sun Q, Harb R, Ashmaig M, Warnick R, et al. A New Equation for Calculation of Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol in Patients With Normolipidemia and/or Hypertriglyceridemia. JAMA Cardiol. 2020 May 1;5(5):540–8.
8. Brown WV, Ballantyne CM, Jones PH, et al. New insights on the accuracy of LDL-C estimation: Implications for clinical practice. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Mar;75(11 Supplement 1):2115. doi:10.1016/S0735-1097(20)32742-5
9. Shrestha R, Chaurasia AK, Jha SC, et al. Comparison of calculated LDL-cholesterol using the Friedewald formula and de Cordova formula with a directly measured LDL-cholesterol in Nepalese population. J Clin Diagn Res. 2019 Nov;13(11):BC01–BC05. doi:10.7860/JCDR/2019/ 42615.13254.