COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF GESTATIONAL DIABETES MELLITUS TREATMENT USING STANDARD DIETARY RESTRICTION VERSUS SUPPLEMENTED DIETARY RESTRICTION AT HUNG VUONG HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Introduction: Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common metabolic disorder during pregnancy [1], with an increasing trend and significant health impacts on both mother and fetus [3, 7,8]. Nutritional therapy is the cornerstone of treatment [10], but the optimal regimen needs identification. Hung Vuong Hospital currently applies a standard dietary restriction [2] and aims to compare its effectiveness with a diet supplemented with a low-GI product [3, 4]. Objective: To compare the effectiveness of glycemic control and tolerability between standard dietary restriction and dietary restriction supplemented with Navie Cerna in GDM patients. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted on 160 newly diagnosed GDM pregnant women undergoing inpatient treatment at Hung Vuong Hospital from February 2023 to February 2024. Patients were divided into two groups: standard dietary restriction (n=80) and supplemented dietary restriction (n=80). Capillary blood glucose was monitored 4 times daily for 7 days. Data were analyzed using Stata. Results: The overall glycemic stability rate was 84.4%. The standard restriction group had a higher stability rate (88.8%) compared to the supplemented group (80.0%). Kaplan-Meier analysis indicated a higher probability of maintaining stability over time in the supplemented group. The supplemented group experienced higher rates of nausea (37.5% vs 28.8%) and vomiting (13.8% vs 8.8%). Gestational age was an independent predictor affecting glycemic stability (HR=1.121, p<0.001). Conclusion: Both dietary regimens are effective in managing glycemia in GDM. The standard dietary restriction provides better stability, while the supplemented diet offers better initial energy supply and a higher probability of maintaining stability over time, despite slightly higher rates of gastrointestinal symptoms
Article Details
Keywords
gestational diabetes mellitus, dietary restriction, glycemic control, Leisure Cerna
References
2. Bộ Y tế (2013) Hướng dẫn quy trình kỹ thuật khám bệnh, chữa bệnh chuyên ngành Phụ Sản - Phẫu thuật nội soi điều trị chửa ngoài tử cung, Hà Nội, chương 2, mục 49 trang 128-131.
3. Bùi Chí Thương (2012) Hiệu quả của tiêm oxytocin vào mạc treo vòi tử cung trong mổ nội soi bảo tồn thai ngoài tử cung, Đại học Y dược thành phố Hồ Chí Minh.
4. Allahyar Jazayeri (2021) "Surgical Management of Ectopic Pregnancy".
5. Elson CJ, Salim R (2016) "Diagnosis and Management of Ectopic Pregnancy: Green-top Guideline No. 21". Bjog, 123 (13), e15-e55.
6. M. L. Gasparri, M. D. Mueller, K. Taghavi, A. Papadia (2018) "Conventional versus Single Port Laparoscopy for the Surgical Treatment of Ectopic Pregnancy: A Meta-Analysis". Gynecol Obstet Invest, 83 (4), 329-337.
7. Yong-Wook Kim, Byung-Joon Park, Duck-Yeong Ro, Tae-Eung Kim (2010) "Single-Port Laparoscopic Myomectomy Using a New Single-Port Transumbilical Morcellation System: Initial Clinical Study". Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology, 17 (5), 587-592.
8. Yong-Wook Kim, Byung-Joon Park, Tea-Eung Kim, Duck-Yeong Ro (2013) "Single-port laparoscopic salpingectomy for surgical treatment of tubal pregnancy: comparison with multi-port laparoscopic salpingectomy". International journal of medical sciences, 10 (8), 1073-1078.
9. F. Mol, N. M. van Mello, A. Strandell, K. Strandell, D. Jurkovic, J. Ross, et al. (2014) "Salpingotomy versus salpingectomy in women with tubal pregnancy (ESEP study): an open-label, multicentre, randomised controlled trial". Lancet, 383 (9927), 1483-1489.
10. H. D. Sun, H. C. Horng, C. H. Liu, S. M. Hsiao, Y. J. Chen, W. H. Chang, et al. (2018) "Comparison of single-port and three-port laparoscopic salpingectomy in the management for tubal pregnancy". J Chin Med Assoc, 81 (5), 469-474.