ASSESSMENT OF SAFETY AND QUALITY OF LIFE IN CANCER PATIENTS RECEIVING CHEMOTHERAPY VIA INFUSION PORT AT HANOI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of chemotherapy administration via subcutaneous infusion ports (Chemoport) in improving the quality of life of cancer patients at Hanoi Medical University Hospital. Methods: A descriptive, retrospective study was conducted on 109 cancer patients indicated for chemotherapy and implanted with Chemoport from June 2024 to December 2024. Data were collected from medical records and patient interviews using the FACT-G questionnaire to assess quality of life before and after port placement. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 22.0. Results: All 109 patients successfully underwent port implantation. The complication rate was 6.4%, including local infection (1.8%), sepsis (0.9%), local venous thrombosis (0.9%), and extravasation (1.8%). Two patients (1.8%) required port removal due to complications. The mean quality-of-life score after port placement was 61.7 ± 5.9, significantly higher than before placement (48.5 ± 6.0, p < 0.001). All four domains (physical, emotional, social, and functional well-being) showed significant improvement post-implantation. Conclusion: Chemotherapy administration via subcutaneous infusion ports is a safe method with a low complication rate and significantly enhances the quality of life of cancer patients.
Article Details
Keywords
chemoport, safety, quality of life
References
2. Boschi R, Rostagno E. Extravasation of Antineoplastic Agents: Prevention and Treatments. Pediatr Rep. 2012;4(3):e28. doi:10.4081/pr.2012.e28
3. Janatolmakan M, Awys L, Khatony A. Cancer patients’ experience with implanted venous ports: A qualitative descriptive study. J Vasc Nurs. 2024;42(1):74-79. doi:10.1016/j.jvn.2024.01.001
4. Yaacob Y, Nguyen DV, Mohamed Z, Ralib ARA, Zakaria R, Muda S. Image-guided chemoport insertion by interventional radiologists: A single-center experience on periprocedural complications. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2013; 23(2):121-125. doi:10.4103/0971-3026.116543
5. Madabhavi I, Patel A, Sarkar M, Anand A, Panchal H, Parikh S. A Study of Use of “PORT” Catheter in Patients with Cancer: A Single-Center Experience. Clin Med Insights Oncol. 2017;11: 1179554917691031. doi:10.1177/ 1179554917691031
6. Samad AMA, Ibrahim YA. Complications of Port A Cath implantation: A single institution experience. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med. 2015;46(4): 907-911. doi:10.1016/j.ejrnm.2015.06.004
7. Lê Văn Long, Hoàng Công Tùng, Nguyễn Thanh Hùng. Đánh giá kết quả sử dụng buồng tiêm truyền cho bệnh nhân ung thư tại Bệnh viện Bạch Mai. Tạp chí Y học Lâm sàng, số 134, tháng 6-2023, https://doi.org/10.52322/jocmbmh. 134.07