EVALUATION OF TREATMENT OUTCOMES FOR INVASIVE FUNGAL INFECTIONS IN CHILDREN AT THE NATIONAL CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: Evaluate the treatment outcomes of invasive fungal infections in children at the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, National Children's Hospital. Subjects and Methods: A descriptive case series study was conducted on 39 patients with invasive fungal infections treated at the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, National Children's Hospital, from January 2022 to December 2023. Results: The median age of the children was 11,5 months (IQR: 4 - 31 months), with males predominating (69,23%). The primary comorbidities were pneumonia and sepsis, which exacerbated immunosuppression. Candida albicans was the most common pathogen (64,1%), followed by Candida tropicalis (23,1%) and Candida parapsilosis (7,6%). The presence of rare strains such as Candida duobushaemulonii and Candida guilliermondii, though less frequent, raised concerns about drug resistance, necessitating thorough susceptibility testing. Fluconazole was the most commonly used treatment (58,97%) due to its availability and efficacy against Candida albicans. Amphotericin B (5,12%) and Caspofungin (2,56%) were used less frequently, while 20,5% of patients received a combination of two antifungal drugs, and 5,12% received three antifungal drugs, reflecting the complexity of severe cases. The median treatment duration was 16 days (IQR: 9 - 28,25 days), and the median hospital stay was 27 days (IQR:16-44 days), indicating a significant disease burden. The mortality rate was high (53,85%), reflecting the severity of invasive fungal infections, particularly in children with severe underlying conditions. Conclusion: The study highlights that invasive fungal infections predominantly affect young children, with pneumonia and sepsis as the main comorbidities. Candida albicans was the most common pathogen in invasive fungal infections. Fluconazole remains the mainstay of treatment for invasive fungal infections.
Article Details
Keywords
Invasive fungal infections, children
References
2. Kullberg BJ, Arendrup MC. Invasive Candidiasis. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(15):1445-1456.
3. Phùng Nguyễn Thế Nguyên, Dương Thiện Trang Thi, Nguyễn Minh Tiến. Đặc điểm bệnh nhi nhiễm nấm tại khoa Hồi sức tích cực - Chống độc - Bệnh viện Nhi Đồng 1 từ 1/2009 đến 12/2013. Tạp chí y học Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh. 2015;24(2).
4. Pfaller MA, Diekema DJ. Epidemiology of invasive candidiasis: a persistent public health problem. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20(1):133-163.
5. Tsai CC, Lay CJ, Wang CL, Lin ML, Yang SP. Prognostic factors of candidemia among nonneutropenic adults with total parenteral nutrition. J Microbiol Immunol Infect Wei Mian Yu Gan Ran Za Zhi. 2011;44(6):461-466.
6. Borg-von Zepelin M, Kunz L, Rüchel R, et al. Epidemiology and antifungal susceptibilities of Candida spp. to six antifungal agents: results from a surveillance study on fungaemia in Germany from July 2004 to August 2005. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2007;60(2):424-428.
7. Steinbach WJ. Pediatric Invasive Candidiasis: Epidemiology and Diagnosis in Children. J Fungi Basel Switz. 2016;2(1):5.
8. Stultz JS, Kohinke R, Pakyz AL. Variability in antifungal utilization among neonatal, pediatric, and adult inpatients in academic medical centers throughout the United States of America. BMC Infect Dis. 2018;18(1):501.
9. Lass-Flörl C, Kanj SS, Govender NP, et al. Invasive candidiasis. Nat Rev Dis Primer. 2024;10(1):20.
10. Pappas PG, Kauffman CA, Andes DR, et al. Clinical Practice Guideline for the Management of Candidiasis: 2016 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clin Infect Dis Off Publ Infect Dis Soc Am. 2016;62(4):e1-50.