ASSESSMENT OF SERUM CORTISOL MEASUREMENTS IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS BETWEEN THE COBAS PRO AND ATELLICA SOLUTION SYSTEMS
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Serum cortisol is a crucial marker in diagnosing and monitoring endocrine disorders. However, differences between automated analytical systems may affect the accuracy and consistency of clinical interpretation. Objective: To assess the analytical agreement of serum cortisol measurements between two automated platforms, Cobas Pro and Atellica Solution, in pediatric samples. Methods: A prospective descriptive study was conducted on 305 pediatric serum samples collected at the Vietnam National Children's Hospital from June to December 2024. Samples were analyzed concurrently on Cobas Pro and Atellica Solution. Analytical performance was evaluated according to CLSI EP15-A3 and EP09-A3 guidelines. Statistical analyses included Pearson correlation, Passing-Bablok regression, and Bland-Altman analysis. Results: The two systems demonstrated a strong correlation (r = 0.9652, p < 0.0001). However, Passing-Bablok regression revealed a significant proportional difference (slope 1.2580; 95% CI: 1.2194–1.2973), and the Cusum test indicated non-linearity (p = 0.04). Bland-Altman analysis showed that Atellica Solution reported higher cortisol values than Cobas Pro by an average of 51.59 nmol/L (corresponding to -19.17%). Calibration differences, antibody specificity, and corticosteroid-binding globulin (CBG) variations likely contributed to the discrepancies. Conclusions: Despite the strong correlation between Cobas Pro and Atellica Solution, significant proportional and systematic differences prevent direct interchangeability without adjustment. It is necessary to establish system-specific reference intervals or apply appropriate conversion factors to ensure accurate clinical interpretation.
Article Details
Keywords
cortisol huyết thanh, serum cortisol, children
References
2. El-Farhan N, Rees DA, Evans C. Measuring cortisol in serum, urine, and saliva – are our assays good enough? Ann Clin Biochem 2017; 54(3): 308-322.
3. Jones G, Barker A. Reference intervals. Clin Biochem Rev 2008; 29(Suppl 1): S93-S97.
4. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). User Verification of Precision and Estimation of Bias; Approved Guideline—Third Edition. CLSI document EP15-A3. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2014.
5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI). Measurement Procedure Comparison and Bias Estimation Using Patient Samples; Approved Guideline—Third Edition. CLSI document EP09-A3. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2013.
6. Yücel N, et al. A comparison of three widely used immunoassay systems in cortisol measurement. Clin Lab 2015; 61(12): 1909-1915.
7. Hawley JM, Owen LJ, Lockhart SJ, et al. Serum cortisol: an up-to-date assessment of routine assay performance. Clin Chem 2016; 62(9): 1220-1229.
8. Agrawal N, Sinha A, Chakraborty PP, Bhattacharjee R, Awasthi A, Maiti A. A cross-sectional study on comparison of serum cortisol concentration measured by chemiluminescent immunoassay in four different automated analyzers in a variety of adrenal disorders. Indian J Endocrinol Metab 2025; 29(1): 83-88.