THE CORRELATION BETWEEN BOLTON INDEX AND MALOCCLUSION STATUS, DENTAL ARCH FORM IN ADULT MUONG INDIVIDUALS AGED 18–30 YEARS

Khởi Trương Đình, Chi Nguyễn Ngọc Linh

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: Determine the Bolton index of adult Muong people aged 18–30 in selected communes of Ninh Binh Province, Vietnam, in 2025. Subject and methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 247 Muong ethnic individuals aged 18–30 years, including 116 males and 131 females, using an intraoral scanner to examine the dental arches and measure the dimensions of permanent teeth in the maxillary and mandibular arches. Results: The total mesiodistal width of the six anterior mandibular teeth was 36,46 ± 1,81 mm while that of the six anterior maxillary teeth was 47,23 ± 2,12 mm; the twelve mandibular teeth was 88,42 ± 3,24 mm and 96,29 ± 3,41 mm for the twelve maxillary teeth. The anterior ratio (AR) according to Angle’s malocclusion Class I, II, and III was 78,29 ± 1,68%; 78,10 ± 1,67% and 78,63 ± 1,79% respectively. The overall ratio (OR) for Class I, II, and III malocclusions was 91,70 ± 1,89%; 91,30 ± 1,76% and 92,24 ± 1,90% respectively. With regard to arch form, the AR for oval, square, and tapered arch types was 78,52 ± 1,75%; 78,53 ± 1,69% and 78,15 ± 1,64% respectively; and the corresponding OR values were 91,89 ± 2,01%; 92,11 ± 1,96% and 91,44 ± 1,94% respectively. Conclusions: There was no significant difference in Bolton's anterior ratio (AR) and overall ratio (OR) between male and female adult Muong individuals. A statistically significant difference was found in the OR among Angle’s malocclusion groups, with Class III subjects exhibiting a higher OR compared to Class I and II. However, no significant difference in AR was observed among the malocclusion types. Additionally, Bolton's ratios showed no significant differences across different arch forms or between Muong and Kinh ethnic groups.

Article Details

References

1. Toshiya Endo et al (2007). Applicability of Bolton’s tooth size ratios to a Japanese orthodontic population. Odontology, 95:57–60.
2. Abdullah M Aldrees et al (2015). Is arch form influenced by sagittal molar relationship or Bolton tooth-size discrepancy?. BMC Oral health, 26, 15-70.
3. Vanessa Machado et al (2018). Bolton ratios in Portuguese subjects among different malocclusion groups. J Clint Exp Dent, 10(9):e864-e868.
4. Rajeev Kumar Mishra et al (2019). Analysis of Interarch Tooth Size Relationship in Nepalese Subjects with Normal Occlusion and Malocclusions. Int J Dent, 18:2019:2761427.
5. Vahid Mollabashi et al (2019). Comparison of Bolton ratio in normal occlusion and different malocclusion groups in Iranian population. Int Orthod, 17(1):143-150.
6. Vanessa Machado et al (2020). A systematic review and meta-analysis on Bolton’s ratios: Normal occlusion and malocclusion. J Orthod, 47(1):7-29.
7. Pinaki Roy et al (2025). Bolton's ratio variations in Angle's Class I, Class II and Class III malocclusions: An observational study. J Clint Exp Dent, 17(3):e280-e285.
8. Lưu Phước Hải (2017). Xây dựng chỉ số Bolton cho người Việt. Luận văn Thạc sĩ Y học, Trường ĐH Y Hà Nội.
9. Lê Nguyên Lâm và CS (2023). Nghiên cứu kích thước độ rộng của răng và sự sai biệt kích thước răng hai hàm theo phân tích Bolton trên sinh viên Răng Hàm Mặt Trường ĐH Y Dược Cần Thơ. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, 524(2), 184-188.
10. Phạm Minh Thảo và CS (2024). Tổng quan hệ thống và phân tích gộp về chỉ số Bolton ứng dụng trong nắn chỉnh răng. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam, 534(2), 334-339.