CONCURRENT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY OUTCOMES USING THE CISPLATIN–ETOPOSIDE REGIMEN WITH INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH LIMITED-STAGE SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER AT K HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) using the Etoposide–Cisplatin (EP) regimen in combination with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Methods: A descriptive longitudinal study incorporating both retrospective and prospective data was conducted at K Hospital from June 2018 to June 2023 on 45 patients treated with the EP regimen and IMRT. Treatment outcomes were assessed using RECIST 1.1 criteria, overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events categorized according to CTCAE version 4.0. Results: The overall response rate reached 91.1%, including 51.1% of patients achieving complete response. Recurrence or metastasis occurred in 73.3% of cases, and 42.2% of patients died during the follow-up period. The most common adverse events were leukopenia (73.3%), anorexia (62.2%), nausea/vomiting (48.9%), and radiation-induced dermatitis (39.9%). Severe side effects primarily affected the hematologic system, while non-hematologic and radiotherapy-related toxicities were generally well controlled. Conclusion: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy using the EP regimen and IMRT demonstrated high therapeutic efficacy with manageable toxicity in patients with limited-stage SCLC. These findings support the clinical application of this regimen in oncology practice in Vietnam
Article Details
Keywords
Small cell lung cancer, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, Etoposide, Cisplatin, IMRT, treatment response, adverse effects.
References
2. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. Mar 2015;65(2):87-108. doi:10.3322/caac.21262
3. Turrisi AT, 3rd, Kim K, Blum R, et al. Twice-daily compared with once-daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited small-cell lung cancer treated concurrently with cisplatin and etoposide. The New England journal of medicine. Jan 28 1999; 340(4): 265-71. doi:10.1056/ nejm199901283400403
4. Xuân VV. Nghiên cứu áp dụng phác đồ kết hợp hóa - xạ trị trong ung thư phổi tế bào nhỏ và đánh giá kết quả điều trị. Đại học Y Hà Nội; 2009.
5. Toàn BC. Một số hiểu biết về xạ trị xa. 1 ed. vol 1. Ung thư phổi. Nhà xuất bản Y học; 2010.
6. De Ruysscher D, Bremer RH, Koppe F, et al. Omission of elective node irradiation on basis of CT-scans in patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial. Radiother Oncol. Sep 2006; 80(3): 307-12. doi:10.1016/j.radonc. 2006.07.029
7. Murray N, Coy P, Pater JL, et al. Importance of timing for thoracic irradiation in the combined modality treatment of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. The National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol. Feb 1993; 11(2): 336-44. doi:10.1200/jco.1993. 11.2.336
8. Faivre-Finn C, Snee M, Ashcroft L, et al. Concurrent once-daily versus twice-daily chemoradiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (CONVERT): an open-label, phase 3, randomised, superiority trial. Lancet Oncol. Aug 2017;18(8): 1116-1125. doi:10.1016/ s1470-2045(17)30318-2
9. Hoàng Trọng T. Đánh giá kết quả hóa xạ trị đồng thời ung thư phổi tế bào nhỏ giai đoạn khu trú phác đồ Cisplatin - Etoposide tại bệnh viện K. Dissertation. Đại học Y Hà Nội; 2022.
10. Le Péchoux C, Dunant A, Senan S, et al. Standard-dose versus higher-dose prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer in complete remission after chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy (PCI 99-01, EORTC 22003-08004, RTOG 0212, and IFCT 99-01): a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. May 2009;10(5):467-74. doi:10. 1016/s1470-2045(09)70101-9