CONCURRENT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY OUTCOMES USING THE CISPLATIN–ETOPOSIDE REGIMEN WITH INTENSITY-MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH LIMITED-STAGE SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER AT K HOSPITAL

Việt Anh Nguyễn, Thị Thanh Cao, Văn Thắng Phạm

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) using the Etoposide–Cisplatin (EP) regimen in combination with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Methods: A descriptive longitudinal study incorporating both retrospective and prospective data was conducted at K Hospital from June 2018 to June 2023 on 45 patients treated with the EP regimen and IMRT. Treatment outcomes were assessed using RECIST 1.1 criteria, overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events categorized according to CTCAE version 4.0. Results: The overall response rate reached 91.1%, including 51.1% of patients achieving complete response. Recurrence or metastasis occurred in 73.3% of cases, and 42.2% of patients died during the follow-up period. The most common adverse events were leukopenia (73.3%), anorexia (62.2%), nausea/vomiting (48.9%), and radiation-induced dermatitis (39.9%). Severe side effects primarily affected the hematologic system, while non-hematologic and radiotherapy-related toxicities were generally well controlled. Conclusion: Concurrent chemoradiotherapy using the EP regimen and IMRT demonstrated high therapeutic efficacy with manageable toxicity in patients with limited-stage SCLC. These findings support the clinical application of this regimen in oncology practice in Vietnam

Article Details

References

Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2017. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. Jan 2017;67(1):7-30. doi:10.3322/ caac.21387
2. Torre LA, Bray F, Siegel RL, Ferlay J, Lortet-Tieulent J, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics, 2012. CA: a cancer journal for clinicians. Mar 2015;65(2):87-108. doi:10.3322/caac.21262
3. Turrisi AT, 3rd, Kim K, Blum R, et al. Twice-daily compared with once-daily thoracic radiotherapy in limited small-cell lung cancer treated concurrently with cisplatin and etoposide. The New England journal of medicine. Jan 28 1999; 340(4): 265-71. doi:10.1056/ nejm199901283400403
4. Xuân VV. Nghiên cứu áp dụng phác đồ kết hợp hóa - xạ trị trong ung thư phổi tế bào nhỏ và đánh giá kết quả điều trị. Đại học Y Hà Nội; 2009.
5. Toàn BC. Một số hiểu biết về xạ trị xa. 1 ed. vol 1. Ung thư phổi. Nhà xuất bản Y học; 2010.
6. De Ruysscher D, Bremer RH, Koppe F, et al. Omission of elective node irradiation on basis of CT-scans in patients with limited disease small cell lung cancer: a phase II trial. Radiother Oncol. Sep 2006; 80(3): 307-12. doi:10.1016/j.radonc. 2006.07.029
7. Murray N, Coy P, Pater JL, et al. Importance of timing for thoracic irradiation in the combined modality treatment of limited-stage small-cell lung cancer. The National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. J Clin Oncol. Feb 1993; 11(2): 336-44. doi:10.1200/jco.1993. 11.2.336
8. Faivre-Finn C, Snee M, Ashcroft L, et al. Concurrent once-daily versus twice-daily chemoradiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (CONVERT): an open-label, phase 3, randomised, superiority trial. Lancet Oncol. Aug 2017;18(8): 1116-1125. doi:10.1016/ s1470-2045(17)30318-2
9. Hoàng Trọng T. Đánh giá kết quả hóa xạ trị đồng thời ung thư phổi tế bào nhỏ giai đoạn khu trú phác đồ Cisplatin - Etoposide tại bệnh viện K. Dissertation. Đại học Y Hà Nội; 2022.
10. Le Péchoux C, Dunant A, Senan S, et al. Standard-dose versus higher-dose prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in patients with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer in complete remission after chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy (PCI 99-01, EORTC 22003-08004, RTOG 0212, and IFCT 99-01): a randomised clinical trial. Lancet Oncol. May 2009;10(5):467-74. doi:10. 1016/s1470-2045(09)70101-9