Article Sidebar

pdf
Date Published: 29/09/2025
Abstract Views: 111
Views pdf: 75
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v554i1.15608
Issue
Vol. 554 No. 1 (2025)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Nguyễn, H. T. M., Bùi, C. T., Nguyễn, P. H. H., & Trịnh , T. X. V. (2025). SURVEY ON COMPLIANCE WITH THE ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY (ERAS) PROTOCOL IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY AT NHAN DAN GIA DINH HOSPITAL. Vietnam Medical Journal, 554(1). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v554i1.15608

SURVEY ON COMPLIANCE WITH THE ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY (ERAS) PROTOCOL IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY AT NHAN DAN GIA DINH HOSPITAL

Huỳnh Trúc Mỹ Nguyễn, Chí Thương Bùi, Phạm Huy Hùng Nguyễn, Trần Xuân Vinh Trịnh

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To determine the compliance rate with the components of the Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocol in laparoscopic hysterectomy. Subjects and Methods: A retrospective case series study was conducted on 145 patients (ASA I–III) who underwent laparoscopic hysterectomy and received care following the ERAS protocol at Nhan Dan Gia Dinh Hospital from January 1, 2023, to June 30, 2024. Results: Among the 15 ERAS components applied to the 145 patients, the average number of components implemented was 11.7 ± 1.0 (range: 9–14). The overall compliance rate with the ERAS protocol was 77.7 ± 6.9% (minimum: 60%, maximum: 93.3%). The proportion of patients with compliance <70% was 10.3% (15 patients), while those with ≥70% compliance accounted for 89.7% (130 patients). Conclusion: These results indicate that the ERAS protocol has been effectively implemented at an initial stage. However, enhanced interdisciplinary collaboration, strict monitoring, and continuous staff training are necessary to further improve compliance.

Article Details

Keywords

Uterus, Laparoscopic hysterectomy, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS)

References

Bisch, S.P., et al., Outcomes of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in gynecologic oncology - A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol, 2021. 161(1): p. 46-55.
2. Ljungqvist, O., M. Scott, and K.C. Fearon, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery: A Review. JAMA Surg, 2017. 152(3): p. 292-298.
3. Nguyen, H., Đánh giá ảnh hưởng của không chuẩn bị đại tràng trong phẫu thuật cắt tử cung ngã bụng. 2019, Đại học Y Dược Thành phố Hồ Chí Minh.
4. Dindo, D., N. Demartines, and P.A. Clavien, Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg, 2004. 240(2): p. 205-13.
5. Hayek, J., et al., Patient outcomes and adherence to an enhanced recovery pathway for open gynecologic surgery: a 6-year single-center experience. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2022. 32(11): p. 1443-1449.
6. Piovano, E., et al., Implementing Enhanced Recovery After Surgery for hysterectomy in a hospital network with audit and feedback: A stepped-wedge cluster randomised trial. Bjog, 2024. 131(9): p. 1207-1217.
7. Nelson, G., et al., Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS®) society guidelines for gynecologic oncology: Addressing implementation challenges - 2023 update. Gynecol Oncol, 2023. 173: p. 58-67.
8. Pache, B., et al., Compliance with enhanced recovery after surgery program in gynecology: are all items of equal importance? Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2019. 29(4): p. 810-815.