Article Sidebar

PDF
Date Published: 05/01/2022
Abstract Views: 216
Views PDF: 133
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v508i1.1564
Issue
Vol. 508 No. 1 (2021)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Việt Hải, H. . (2022). CEPHALOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS WITH CLASS II MALOCCLUSION. Vietnam Medical Journal, 508(1). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v508i1.1564

CEPHALOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF PATIENTS WITH CLASS II MALOCCLUSION

Hoàng Việt Hải1,
1 Hanoi Medical University

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the cephalometric dento-skeletal characteristics of the Class II with retracted mandibular patients. Materials and methods: The material examined included 46 lateral head radiographs of the Class II with retracted mandibular patients. Age range of the representing children was 10–13 years. Results: There were prognathic maxilla as indicated by slightly higher SNA angle (83.60), retrognathic mandible as indicated by reduced SNB angle (75.90), skeletal class II base relationship as shown by higher ANB angle (6.50), decreased interincisal angle as shown by low UI/LI angle (114.40). No statistically significant difference between genders was found. Conclusions: The mandible was retracted in relation to the cranial base. The maxillo-mandibular relation were  Class II and patients have proclined upper and lower incisors.

Article Details

Keywords

Cephalometrics, Class II malocclusion, Retrognathic mandible

References

1. Bilgic F, Gelgor IE, Celebi AA (2015). Malocclusion prevalence and orthodontic treatment need in central Anatolian adolescents compared to European and other nations' adolescents. Dental Press J. Orthod. 20 (6):75-81.
2. Thilander B, Pena L, Infante C (2001). Prevalence of malocclusion and orthodontic treatment need in children and adolescents in Bogota, Colombia. An epidemiological study related to different stages of dental development. Eur J Orthod; 23(2):153-67.
3. Perillo L, Masucci C, Ferro F, Apicella D, Baccetti T (2010). Prevalence of orthodontic treatment need in southern Italian schoolchildren. Eur J Orthod. 32(1):49-53.
4. Steiner C.C (1953). Cephalometric for you and me. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 39(10):729-755.
5. Tomblyn T, Rogers M, Andrews L 2nd, Martin C, Tremont T, Gunel E, Ngan P. (2016). Cephalometric study of Class II Division 1 patients treated with an extended-duration, reinforced, banded Herbst appliance followed by fixed appliances. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop;150(5):818-830.
6. Lau JWP, Hägg U(1999). Cephalometric morphology of Chinese with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. British Dental Journal 1999; 186: 188–190
7. Freitas MR, Santos MAC, Freitas KMS, Janson G, Freitas DS, Henriques JFC (2005). Cephalometric characterization of skeletal class II, division 1 malocclusion in white brazilian subjects. J Appl Oral Sci 2005; 13(2): 198-203