Article Sidebar

pdf
Date Published: 03/10/2025
Abstract Views: 182
Views pdf: 131
DOI: https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v554i2.15676
Issue
Vol. 554 No. 2 (2025)
Section
Các bài báo
How to Cite
Đỗ Văn, Đức, Nguyễn Quảng, B., & Trần Thị Thu, H. . (2025). ELUVATION RESULTS OF CROSSEN METHODON TREATMENT OF PROLAPSUSAT THE NATIONAL HOSPITAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY. Vietnam Medical Journal, 554(2). https://doi.org/10.51298/vmj.v554i2.15676

ELUVATION RESULTS OF CROSSEN METHODON TREATMENT OF PROLAPSUSAT THE NATIONAL HOSPITAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY

Đức Đỗ Văn, Bắc Nguyễn Quảng, Hạnh Trần Thị Thu

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To describe clinical characteristics and results of Crossen surgery in the treatment of prolapsus at the National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology in 2023. Subjects and methods: Adescriptiveretrospective study on87 patients who underwent Crossen surgery at the National Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology from January 2023 to December 2023. Results: Mean age was 64.6 ± 6.7 years. The patients received spinal anesthesia in 92% of the cases. The average surgery time was 52.33 ± 14.97 minutes. The rate of postoperative complications was 3.4%. The meanrecovery time was 4.36 ± 0.8 days. Conclusion: The average surgical time was short, postoperative complications were rare, and the recovery time was minimal.

Article Details

Keywords

Prolapse, Crossen surgery

References

1. Lê Điềm. Sa sinh dục. In: Bách Khoa Toàn Thư. Nhà xuất bản y học; 2003:355-360.
2. Seng Sam Ath. Đánh giá phẫu thuật crossen trong điều trị sa sinh dục tại bệnh viện phụ sản trung ương trong 5 năm. Luận văn thạc sỹ Y học. 2011:8-9.
3. Hoàng Thị Thu Huyền HSH. Nghiên cứu kết quả phẫu thuật điều trị sa sinh dục tại bệnh viện Phụ sản Trung ương. Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 2017:139-142.
4. Đỗ Xuân Hai. Điều trị sa sinh dục độ III bằng phương pháp phẫu thuật tại bệnh viện Phụ sản Hà Nội năm 2018. Luận văn chuyên khoa cấp II. 2019.
5. Brito LGO, Pereira GMV, Moalli P, et al. Age and/or postmenopausal status as risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse development: systematic review with meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2022; 33(1): 15-29. doi:10.1007/s00192-021-04953-1
6. Swift S, Woodman P, O’Boyle A, et al. Pelvic Organ Support Study (POSST): The distribution, clinical definition, and epidemiologic condition of pelvic organ support defects. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2005;192(3):795-806. doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2004.10.602
7. Isık H, Aynıoglu O, Sahbaz A, Selimoglu R, Timur H, Harma M. Are hypertension and diabetes mellitus risk factors for pelvic organ prolapse? European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. 2016;197: 59-62. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2015. 11.035
8. Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, Aragaki A, Barnabei V, McTiernan A. Pelvic organ prolapse in the women’s health initiative: Gravity and gravidity. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2002;186(6): 1160-1166. doi:10. 1067/mob.2002.123819