CLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CERVICAL DENTIN HYPERSENSITIVITY IN PATIENTS TREATED AT SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY, HANOI MEDICAL UNIVERSITY

Anh Nguyễn Thị Ngọc, Nga Phạm Thị Tuyết, Mai Nguyễn Phương, Hạnh Phan Thị Hồng, Dân Vũ Mạnh

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To describe the clinical characteristics of dentin hypersensitivity in patients treated for cervical dentin hypersensitivity at School of Dentistry, Hanoi Medical University. Subjects and Methods: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 124 teeth in 30 patients with cervical dentin hypersensitivity treated at School of Dentistry, Hanoi Medical University, from July 2024 to April 2025. Data were collected through questionnaires and clinical examinations, and processed using SPSS 20 software. Results: There was no significant difference in dentin hypersensitivity distribution among the three age groups. The proportion of female patients (70%) was higher than male patients (30%). Molars had the highest rate of dentin hypersensitivity (46.77%), followed by premolars (27.42%) and anterior teeth (25.81%). The main causes of hypersensitivity in molars and premolars were abrasion and abfraction lesions respectively. Gingival recession and a combination of factors were the primary causes in anterior teeth. Cold stimuli were the most common trigger for hypersensitivity symptoms (56.67%). Most teeth exhibited moderate sensitivity to air stimulus based on the VAS scale (67.7%) and tactile stimulus measured with the Yeaple electronic probe (57.3%). Conclusion: Molars showed the highest prevalence of dentin hypersensitivity. Cervical abrasion was the most common cause. Cold was the most frequent triggering factor. Teeth with moderate dentin hypersensitivity accounted for the highest proportion.

Article Details

References

1. Mantzourani M, Sharma D. Dentine sensitivity: past, present and future. J Dent. 2013;41 Suppl 4:S3-17. doi:10.1016/S0300-5712(13)70002-2
2. Hiroyasu Y, Hozumi Y, Souei A, Kazuyoshi Y, Masayoshi T. In-vitro Dentinal Tubule Occlusion and Clinical Desensitization by Application of“Nanoseal.” Jpn J Conserv Dent. 2014;57(4): 333-342. doi:10.11471/shikahozon. 57.333
3. Salem FMF, Hassan RR, Alsherbiney HH. Clinical evaluation of efficacy of shield force plus varnish versus sodium fluoride on cervical dentin hypersensitivity on adult patients: a randomized clinical trial. J Pharm Negat Results. Published online February 10, 2023:1510-1522. doi:10.47750/pnr.2023.14.03.199
4. Brännström M. Dentin sensitivity and aspiration of odontoblasts. J Am Dent Assoc. 1963; 66(3): 366-370. doi:10.14219/jada.archive. 1963.0104
5. Orchardson R, Gillam DG. Managing dentin hypersensitivity. J Am Dent Assoc 1939. 2006;137(7):990-998; quiz 1028-1029. doi:10. 14219/jada.archive.2006.0321
6. Addy M, Hunter ML. Can tooth brushing damage your health? Effects on oral and dental tissues. Int Dent J. 2003;53 Suppl 3:177-186. doi:10.1111/j.1875-595x.2003.tb00768.x
7. Porto ICCM, Andrade AKM, Montes MAJR. Diagnosis and treatment of dentinal hypersensitivity. J Oral Sci. 2009;51(3):323-332. doi:10.2334/josnusd.51.323
8. Alcântara PM, Barroso NFF, Botelho AM, Douglas-de-Oliveira DW, Gonçalves PF, Flecha OD. Associated factors to cervical dentin hypersensitivity in adults: a transversal study. BMC Oral Health. 2018;18(1):155. doi:10.1186/ s12903-018-0616-1