PRELIMINARY EVALUATION OF MODIFIED ENDOSCOPIC LASER-ASSISTED DACRYOCYSTORHINOSTOMY

Thị Cẩm Vân Biện, Thanh Nam Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To analyze the efficacy and safety of a modified endoscopic laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy (DCR). Study Design: A prospective interventional case series. Methods: Twenty-nine eyes from 29 patients aged over 18 years (ranging from 42 to 90 years, with a mean age of 61.2 ± 11.1 years) underwent modified endoscopic multidiode laser-assisted DCR. The technique involved creating a bony ostium from inside the nasal cavity to treat primary acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction (PANDO). The mean follow-up duration was 6 months. Results: Among the patients, 28 (96.6%) were female and 1 (3.4%) was male. Mild nasal septal deviation was observed in 6.9% of cases, and middle turbinate hypertrophy was noted in another 6.9%. Prior to surgery, the majority (86.2%) presented with grade 3 epiphora according to the Sahlin scale. Preoperative diagnoses included chronic dacryocystitis with mucopurulent discharge in 69% of cases and simple nasolacrimal duct obstruction with isolated tearing in 31%. At the 6-month follow-up, the mean size of the osteotomy was 5 ± 3.38 mm. The average tear meniscus height decreased from 0.91 mm preoperatively to 0.28 mm postoperatively. Anatomical and functional success rates were 93.1% and 89.6%, respectively. Two cases (6.9%) developed synechiae between the middle turbinate and the osteotomy site, resulting in recurrent obstruction by the 6-month mark. Conclusion: Modified endoscopic laser-assisted DCR is a highly effective and safe surgical approach for treating PANDO. The technique overcomes the challenges of conventional transcanalicular approaches, minimizes the risk of thermal injury to the nasal turbinates and adjacent tissues, and allows for easier manipulation and creation of a large osteotomy.

Article Details

References

1. Dupy - Dutemps BM. Procédé plastique de dacryocystorhinostie et fcs résultats. Ann ocul. (1921);158::241-256.
2. Massaro BM, Gonnering RS, Harris GJJAoo. Endonasal laser dacryocystorhinostomy: a new approach to nasolacrimal duct obstruction. 1990;108(8):1172-1176.
3. Đặng Xuân Mai NTN, Lê Minh Thông, Nguyễn Thanh Nam. Đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật nối thông túi lệ mũi bằng laser multidiod qua lệ quản. Y học Tp Hồ Chí Minh. (2018).Vol.22(1).
4. Balikoglu-Yilmaz M, Yilmaz T, Taskin U, et al. Prospective comparison of 3 dacryocystorhinostomy surgeries: external versus endoscopic versus transcanalicular multidiode laser. 2015;31(1):13-18.
5. Doğan M, Alizada, A., Yavaş, G. F., Kahveci, O. K., & Bakan, O. Laser-assisted dacryocystorhinostomy in nasolacrimal duct obstruction: 5-year follow-up. International journal of ophthalmology, (2018). ;11(10),:1616.
6. Bulut A, Aslan MG, Oner VJBEJ. Transcanalicular multidiode laser versus external dacryocystorhinostomy in the treatment of acquired nasolacrimal duct obstruction. 2021;6(4):315-319.
7. Tokat T, Tokat S, Kusbeci TJNJoCP. Long-term outcomes of transcanalicular laser dacryocystorhinostomy versus endonasal dacryocystorhinostomy and a review of the literature. 2023;26(8):1069-1074.
8. Ali MJ, Gupta A, Lakshmi CS, Ali MHJEJoO. The FICI grading for a dacryocystorhinostomy ostium. 2022;32(1):129-133.
9. Różycki R, Skrzypiec Ł, Ulaszewska K, Gąsior JS, Wasyluk JJD. Effectiveness and Factors Influencing Success of Transcanalicular Laser-Assisted Endoscopic Dacryocystor-hinostomy: Cohort Study. 2024; 14(17):1944.
10. Pinto C, Queirós T, Ferreira C. Transcanalicular Diode Laser-Assisted Dacryocystorhinostomy–Success Rates and Related Factors During 3 Years of Follow-Up. Taylor & Francis; 2021:501-506.