EVALUATION OF CELL PROLIFERATION INDEX BY FLOW CYTOMETRY: A PROMISING APPROACH FOR CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING

Thị Ngọc Mi Trần, Thị Mai Anh Nguyễn, Hoàng Tuyết Minh Nguyễn, Kiều Trang Hà, Ngọc Khánh Linh Nguyễn, Đặng Anh Thư Phan

Main Article Content

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is the fourth most common malignancy among women globally and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality in developing countries. While the Papanicolaou (Pap) test remains the standard method for cervical cancer screening, its sensitivity remains limited, particularly for detecting low- and intermediate-grade lesions. Recently, flow cytometry (FCM) has emerged as a potential adjunctive tool for cervical cancer screening due to its ability to assess cellular biological features, including the Cell Proliferation Index (CPI). Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of CPI, determined by FCM, in classifying cervical cytological abnormalities and enhancing the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening. Method: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 202 liquid-based cytology (LBC) samples collected from Dai Phuoc General Clinic and University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City – Branch 2, between September 2024 and April 2025. Pap test and high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) PCR results were retrospectively reviewed. CPI was analyzed using FCM on residual LBC samples. Results: CPI increased progressively with cytological abnormality severity (p < 0.001). The optimal CPI cut-off value was 14.51%, with a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 73.75%, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77–0.92; p < 0.001) for detecting lesions greater than ASC-US. The Kappa agreement between FCM and Pap results was 0.34 and 0.37 in two classification settings, with observed concordance rates of 72.77% and 75.68%, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: CPI effectively discriminates cervical cytological abnormalities, particularly in HR-HPV–positive women. Flow cytometry shows potential as a complementary tool to the Pap test, improving sensitivity in screening for precancerous cervical lesions.

Article Details

References

WHO. Data visualization tools for exploring the global cancer burden in 2022. The Global cancer observatory. 2024. doi: https://gco.iarc.who.int/ today/en.
2. Bedell SL, Goldstein LS, Goldstein AR, Goldstein AT. Cervical Cancer Screening: Past, Present, and Future. Sexual Medicine Reviews. 2020;8(1):28-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.sxmr.2019.09.005.
3. Curry SJ, Krist AH, Owens DK, Barry MJ, Caughey AB, Davidson KW, et al. Screening for Cervical Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Jama. 2018; 320(7):674-86. Epub 2018/08/25. doi: 10.1001/ jama. 2018.10897. PubMed PMID: 30140884.
4. Heo I, Kwak HJ, Nah EH, Cho S, Kim S, Cho HI. Evaluation of the LC-1000 Flow Cytometry Screening System for Cervical Cancer Screening in Routine Health Checkups. Acta cytologica. 2018;62(4):279-87. Epub 2018/05/31. doi: 10.1159/000489079. PubMed PMID: 29843120.
5. Yamazaki T, Abe S, Morisaki H, Akamata N, Kurosu H, Ebi R, et al. The Flow Cytometry based cell analysis technology and Application to cervical cancer testing. Cytometry Research. 2018; 28(1): 31-9. doi: 10.18947/cytometry research.28.1_31.
6. Gupta S, Nagtode N, Chandra V, Gomase K. From Diagnosis to Treatment: Exploring the Latest Management Trends in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Cureus. 2023;15(12): e50291. Epub 2024/01/11. doi: 10.7759/ cureus.50291. PubMed PMID: 38205499; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC10776490.
7. Chau Dang M, Teresa A. Gilewski, MD, Antonella Surbone, MD, and Larry Norton, MD. Holland-Frei Cancer Medicine. Hamilton (ON): BC Decker2003.
8. McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82. Epub 2012/10/25. PubMed PMID: 23092060; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3900052.
9. Zhu H, Shen Z, Luo H, Zhang W, Zhu X. Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection-Associated Risk of Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Medicine. 2016;95(13):e3077. Epub 2016/04/05. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000003077. PubMed PMID: 27043670; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4998531.
10. Nahm FS. Receiver operating characteristic curve: overview and practical use for clinicians. Korean journal of anesthesiology. 2022;75(1):25-36. Epub 2022/02/08. doi: 10.4097/kja.21209. PubMed PMID: 35124947; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC8831439.