EVALUATION OF CELL PROLIFERATION INDEX BY FLOW CYTOMETRY: A PROMISING APPROACH FOR CERVICAL CANCER SCREENING
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background: Cervical cancer is the fourth most common malignancy among women globally and a leading cause of cancer-related mortality in developing countries. While the Papanicolaou (Pap) test remains the standard method for cervical cancer screening, its sensitivity remains limited, particularly for detecting low- and intermediate-grade lesions. Recently, flow cytometry (FCM) has emerged as a potential adjunctive tool for cervical cancer screening due to its ability to assess cellular biological features, including the Cell Proliferation Index (CPI). Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic value of CPI, determined by FCM, in classifying cervical cytological abnormalities and enhancing the effectiveness of cervical cancer screening. Method: A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted on 202 liquid-based cytology (LBC) samples collected from Dai Phuoc General Clinic and University Medical Center Ho Chi Minh City – Branch 2, between September 2024 and April 2025. Pap test and high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) PCR results were retrospectively reviewed. CPI was analyzed using FCM on residual LBC samples. Results: CPI increased progressively with cytological abnormality severity (p < 0.001). The optimal CPI cut-off value was 14.51%, with a sensitivity of 88%, specificity of 73.75%, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.77–0.92; p < 0.001) for detecting lesions greater than ASC-US. The Kappa agreement between FCM and Pap results was 0.34 and 0.37 in two classification settings, with observed concordance rates of 72.77% and 75.68%, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: CPI effectively discriminates cervical cytological abnormalities, particularly in HR-HPV–positive women. Flow cytometry shows potential as a complementary tool to the Pap test, improving sensitivity in screening for precancerous cervical lesions.
Article Details
Keywords
Flow cytometry, cell proliferation, cervical cancer screening, HR-HPV, CPI
References
2. Bedell SL, Goldstein LS, Goldstein AR, Goldstein AT. Cervical Cancer Screening: Past, Present, and Future. Sexual Medicine Reviews. 2020;8(1):28-37. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.sxmr.2019.09.005.
3. Curry SJ, Krist AH, Owens DK, Barry MJ, Caughey AB, Davidson KW, et al. Screening for Cervical Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. Jama. 2018; 320(7):674-86. Epub 2018/08/25. doi: 10.1001/ jama. 2018.10897. PubMed PMID: 30140884.
4. Heo I, Kwak HJ, Nah EH, Cho S, Kim S, Cho HI. Evaluation of the LC-1000 Flow Cytometry Screening System for Cervical Cancer Screening in Routine Health Checkups. Acta cytologica. 2018;62(4):279-87. Epub 2018/05/31. doi: 10.1159/000489079. PubMed PMID: 29843120.
5. Yamazaki T, Abe S, Morisaki H, Akamata N, Kurosu H, Ebi R, et al. The Flow Cytometry based cell analysis technology and Application to cervical cancer testing. Cytometry Research. 2018; 28(1): 31-9. doi: 10.18947/cytometry research.28.1_31.
6. Gupta S, Nagtode N, Chandra V, Gomase K. From Diagnosis to Treatment: Exploring the Latest Management Trends in Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia. Cureus. 2023;15(12): e50291. Epub 2024/01/11. doi: 10.7759/ cureus.50291. PubMed PMID: 38205499; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC10776490.
7. Chau Dang M, Teresa A. Gilewski, MD, Antonella Surbone, MD, and Larry Norton, MD. Holland-Frei Cancer Medicine. Hamilton (ON): BC Decker2003.
8. McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22(3):276-82. Epub 2012/10/25. PubMed PMID: 23092060; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3900052.
9. Zhu H, Shen Z, Luo H, Zhang W, Zhu X. Chlamydia Trachomatis Infection-Associated Risk of Cervical Cancer: A Meta-Analysis. Medicine. 2016;95(13):e3077. Epub 2016/04/05. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000003077. PubMed PMID: 27043670; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4998531.
10. Nahm FS. Receiver operating characteristic curve: overview and practical use for clinicians. Korean journal of anesthesiology. 2022;75(1):25-36. Epub 2022/02/08. doi: 10.4097/kja.21209. PubMed PMID: 35124947; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC8831439.