CLINICAL AND PARACLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS IN PATIENTS WITH INTRAPRITONEEAL BLADDER RUPTURE TREATED AT CHO RAY HOSPITAL
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: Describe the clinical features, paraclinical characteristics, and associated lesions of patients with intraperitoneal bladder rupture treated at Cho Ray Hospital. Materials and Methods: A retrospective descriptive case series study, including all cases diagnosed with intraperitoneal bladder rupture and treated at Cho Ray Hospital from January 2019 to June 2024. Results: The study included 111 cases diagnosed with intraperitoneal bladder rupture and treated at Cho Ray Hospital. The mean age was 39.8 ± 15.3 years, with the majority being of working age (20–40 years). The male-to-female ratio was approximately 6.9:1. The most common cause of hospital admission was traffic accidents, accounting for 81.1% of cases. The most frequent clinical features were suprapubic pain and hematuria, observed in 84.8% and 90.2% of patients, respectively, while signs of traumatic shock were present in 5.4% of cases. In our study, 9% of cases were spontaneous intraperitoneal bladder ruptures, which typically presented with atypical symptoms. These patients often presented late, leading to delayed or missed diagnoses. Cystography and CT-cystography played crucial roles in diagnosing intraperitoneal bladder rupture, with sensitivities approaching 95%. In our study, 89.2% of cases were diagnosed with intraperitoneal bladder rupture preoperatively. The most common associated injuries were craniofacial trauma and pelvic fractures, with incidences of 19.8% and 13.5%, respectively. Conclusions: Intraperitoneal bladder rupture commonly occurs in individuals of working age, with traffic accidents being the most frequent cause. Traumatic shock was observed in 5.4% of cases. Imaging modalities such as cystography and CT-cystography play a crucial role in diagnosis, with sensitivities approaching 95%.
Article Details
Keywords
Intraperitoneal bladder rupture, cho ray
References
2. Trần Lê Linh Phương, Lê Tuấn Anh. Điều trị chấn thương vỡ bàng quang trong phúc mạc bằng phẫu thuật nội soi ổ bụng, kinh nghiệm qua 22 trường hợp. Tập san Y Học TP. Hồ Chí Minh. 2009;Vol. 13 - No 1, tr 28 – 32.
3. Papadopoulos, I., Michalopoulos, A., Basdekis, D., Paramythiotis, D., & Fotiadis, C. Spontaneous intraperitoneal bladder rupture: A rare clinical entity. BMJ Case Reports. 2013. bcr2013009679. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-009679.
4. Nguyễn Xuân Toàn. Đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật nội soi trên chấn thương bụng kín có vỡ bàng quang trong phúc mạc. Luận văn Thạc sĩ Y học, Đại học Y Dược TP.HCM.2013.
5. Kinzie AM, Alan HT., Ziad NK., et al. Blunt traumatic bladder rupture: a 10-year perspective. Am Surq. 2013;79(6): 589-593.
6. Trịnh Hoàng Tín. Đánh giá kết quả chẩn đoán và xử trí phẫu thuật vỡ bàng quang ngoài phúc mạc. Luận văn Thạc sĩ Y học, Đại học Y Dược TP.HCM.2015.
7. Trần Lê Linh Phương. Điều trị chấn thương đường niệu dưới phức tạp trong gãy khung chậu nặng. Luận án tiến sĩ y học. Trường đại học Y Dược TP.HCM.2003.
8. Hoff W.S., Holevar M., Nagy K.K., et al. Practice management guidelines for the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma: the East practice management guidelines work group. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2002;53(3): 602-615.
9. Christopher A. Hass. Limitations of routine spiral computerized tomography in the evaluation of bladder trauma. J Urol. 1999;162(1): 51-52.
10. Quagliano P.V., et al. Diagnosis of blunt bladder injury: A prospective comparative study of computed tomography cystography and conventional retrograde cystography. J Trauma. 2006; 61: 410.