CLINICAL AND PARACLINICAL CHARACTERISTICS IN PATIENTS WITH INTRAPRITONEEAL BLADDER RUPTURE TREATED AT CHO RAY HOSPITAL

Kinh Luân Thái, Quý Thuận Châu, Văn Chương Lâm

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: Describe the clinical features, paraclinical characteristics, and associated lesions of patients with intraperitoneal bladder rupture treated at Cho Ray Hospital. Materials and Methods: A retrospective descriptive case series study, including all cases diagnosed with intraperitoneal bladder rupture and treated at Cho Ray Hospital from January 2019 to June 2024. Results: The study included 111 cases diagnosed with intraperitoneal bladder rupture and treated at Cho Ray Hospital. The mean age was 39.8 ± 15.3 years, with the majority being of working age (20–40 years). The male-to-female ratio was approximately 6.9:1. The most common cause of hospital admission was traffic accidents, accounting for 81.1% of cases. The most frequent clinical features were suprapubic pain and hematuria, observed in 84.8% and 90.2% of patients, respectively, while signs of traumatic shock were present in 5.4% of cases. In our study, 9% of cases were spontaneous intraperitoneal bladder ruptures, which typically presented with atypical symptoms. These patients often presented late, leading to delayed or missed diagnoses. Cystography and CT-cystography played crucial roles in diagnosing intraperitoneal bladder rupture, with sensitivities approaching 95%. In our study, 89.2% of cases were diagnosed with intraperitoneal bladder rupture preoperatively. The most common associated injuries were craniofacial trauma and pelvic fractures, with incidences of 19.8% and 13.5%, respectively. Conclusions: Intraperitoneal bladder rupture commonly occurs in individuals of working age, with traffic accidents being the most frequent cause. Traumatic shock was observed in 5.4% of cases. Imaging modalities such as cystography and CT-cystography play a crucial role in diagnosis, with sensitivities approaching 95%.

Article Details

References

1. Đỗ Trường Thành. Chấn thương bàng quang. Cấp cứu ngoại khoa tập 2, Nhà Xuất bản Giáo dục Việt Nam, Hà Nội. 2010; tr 293 – 299.
2. Trần Lê Linh Phương, Lê Tuấn Anh. Điều trị chấn thương vỡ bàng quang trong phúc mạc bằng phẫu thuật nội soi ổ bụng, kinh nghiệm qua 22 trường hợp. Tập san Y Học TP. Hồ Chí Minh. 2009;Vol. 13 - No 1, tr 28 – 32.
3. Papadopoulos, I., Michalopoulos, A., Basdekis, D., Paramythiotis, D., & Fotiadis, C. Spontaneous intraperitoneal bladder rupture: A rare clinical entity. BMJ Case Reports. 2013. bcr2013009679. https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2013-009679.
4. Nguyễn Xuân Toàn. Đánh giá kết quả phẫu thuật nội soi trên chấn thương bụng kín có vỡ bàng quang trong phúc mạc. Luận văn Thạc sĩ Y học, Đại học Y Dược TP.HCM.2013.
5. Kinzie AM, Alan HT., Ziad NK., et al. Blunt traumatic bladder rupture: a 10-year perspective. Am Surq. 2013;79(6): 589-593.
6. Trịnh Hoàng Tín. Đánh giá kết quả chẩn đoán và xử trí phẫu thuật vỡ bàng quang ngoài phúc mạc. Luận văn Thạc sĩ Y học, Đại học Y Dược TP.HCM.2015.
7. Trần Lê Linh Phương. Điều trị chấn thương đường niệu dưới phức tạp trong gãy khung chậu nặng. Luận án tiến sĩ y học. Trường đại học Y Dược TP.HCM.2003.
8. Hoff W.S., Holevar M., Nagy K.K., et al. Practice management guidelines for the evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma: the East practice management guidelines work group. Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery. 2002;53(3): 602-615.
9. Christopher A. Hass. Limitations of routine spiral computerized tomography in the evaluation of bladder trauma. J Urol. 1999;162(1): 51-52.
10. Quagliano P.V., et al. Diagnosis of blunt bladder injury: A prospective comparative study of computed tomography cystography and conventional retrograde cystography. J Trauma. 2006; 61: 410.