OBSERVED RATE AND ASSOCIATED FACTORS OF SELF-REPORTED SENSITIVE SKIN SYNDROME

Thị Hồng Nhung Nguyễn, Thị Hà Vinh Nguyễn, Nguyệt Minh Vũ

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To assess the self-reported prevalence of Sensitive Skin Syndrome (SSS) and identify its associated factors. Materials and Methods: A total of 198 participants who presented to the National Hospital of Dermatology and Venereology were enrolled. After being provided with a formal definition of SSS, participants self-assessed their condition and answered questions about potential related factors. Results: Among the 198 participants, who exhibited a female-to-male ratio of 1.82:1, the self-reported prevalence of SSS was 60.6%. The SSS prevalence showed no statistically significant association with age or gender (p>0.05). Individuals with SSS were significantly more likely to react to various triggers (p≤0.001). The factors most strongly associated with SSS were exposure to wind (OR=8.531), physical exercise (OR=8.333), psychological stress (OR=7.967), and soaps/ detergents (OR=7.618). Other common triggers included hot/dry air, sun exposure, cold/humid air, use of hygiene soaps/cleansers, use of cosmetics, exposure to smog/pollutants. The median self-perceived sensitivity score (VAS) was 5 (interquartile range: 3–6). The primary sensory symptoms were itching (70.0%) and stinging (33.3%), erythema was also a common physical sign (54.2%). Symptoms were most frequently exacerbated during winter (38.3%) and summer (37.5%). Conclusion: Sensitive skin syndrome is a common condition, affecting individuals regardless of age or gender. It is characterized by subjective sensory symptoms and objective erythema, significantly triggered by a wide range of environmental, chemical, and endogenous factors. Notably, symptoms tend to worsen during winter and summer.

Article Details

References

Misery L, Ständer S, Szepietowski JC, et al. Definition of Sensitive Skin: An Expert Position Paper from the Special Interest Group on Sensitive Skin of the International Forum for the Study of Itch. Acta Derm Venereol. 2017;97(1):4-6. doi:10.2340/00015555-2397
2. Chen W, Dai R, Li L. The prevalence of self-declared sensitive skin: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology. 2020;34(8): 1779-1788. doi:10.1111/jdv.16166
3. Kim YR, Cheon HI, Misery L, et al. Sensitive skin in Korean population: An epidemiological approach. Skin Res Technol. 2018;24(2):229-234. doi:10.1111/srt.12418
4. Li B, Cai X, Wang L, et al. A GWAS Finds Variants at 2p21 Associated with Self-Reported Sensitive Skin in the Han Chinese Population. J Invest Dermatol. 2022;142(1):243-247.e9. doi:10. 1016/j.jid.2021.04.021
5. Misery L, Jourdan E, Huet F, et al. Sensitive skin in France: a study on prevalence, relationship with age and skin type and impact on quality of life. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology : JEADV. 2018;32(5). doi:10.1111/jdv.14837
6. Kamide R, Misery L, Perez-Cullell N, et al. Sensitive skin evaluation in the Japanese population. J Dermatol. 2013;40(3):177-181. doi:10.1111/1346-8138.12027
7. Farage MA. How do perceptions of sensitive skin differ at different anatomical sites? An epidemiological study. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2009; 34(8): e521-530. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2230. 2009.03487.x
8. Boonchai W, Kanokrungsee S, Prasertsook S, et al. Sensitive skin in Thailand: Validity of Thai versions of the sensitive scale and the burden of sensitive skin questionnaires. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2024;23(11):3776-3778. doi:10.1111/ jocd.16341
9. Richters RJH, Uzunbajakava NE, Hendriks JCM, et al. A model for perception-based identification of sensitive skin. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017;31(2): 267-273. doi:10. 1111/jdv.13829
10. Misery L, Myon E, Martin N, et al. Sensitive skin: psychological effects and seasonal changes. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2007;21(5):620-628. doi:10.1111/j.1468-3083.2006.02027.x