EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TREATMENT AND SOME RELATED FACTORS OF ENDOVASCULAR INTERVENTION IN THE MANAGEMENT OF POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE IN GASTROENTEROLOGICAL SURGERY
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To assess the effectiveness, safety, and some related factors of endovascular embolization in the treatment of postoperative bleeding in gastrointestinal surgery at Viet Duc Hospital. Subjects and Methods: Cross-sectional descriptive study with retrospective and prospective data collection, conducted from September 2019 to June 2025. Twenty-eight patients diagnosed with intra-abdominal bleeding or gastrointestinal hemorrhage (GIH) after gastrointestinal-hepato-pancreatic surgery who underwent embolization at Viet Duc Hospital were included. Results: Among the 28 patients, there were 18 males and 10 females, with an average age of 65.82 years (ranging from 33 to 92). Surgical history included bowel resection (28.6%), pancreaticoduodenectomy (28.6%), hepatobiliary surgery (21.4%), gastric–duodenal perforation repair (14.3%), and gastrointestinal fistula surgery (7.1%). Technical success was achieved in 100% (28/28), and clinical success was 82.8% (23/28). Factors potentially associated with clinical failure included having two or more comorbidities, significant hemoglobin decrease (>30 g/L), and age over 70, though these differences were not statistically significant. No complications directly related to the intervention were observed. The 30-day mortality rate post-embolization was 17.85% (5/28); among these, three died due to recurrent bleeding combined with other factors such as pneumonia, cachexia, and chronic diseases; two died from severe infections and multiorgan failure unrelated to recurrent bleeding. Conclusion: Endovascular embolization is a safe and effective method for managing postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding, especially in patients with both intra-abdominal and gastrointestinal hemorrhage who fail endoscopic treatment.
Article Details
Keywords
postoperative bleeding, endovascular intervention, gastrointestinal surgery
References
2. Kim, S. H., et al. (2021), "Risk of Postoperative Gastrointestinal Bleeding and Its Associated Factors: A Nationwide Population-Based Study in Korea", J Pers Med. 11(11).
3. Tạ, Thanh Chiến, Trịnh, Hồng Sơn, and Đỗ, Trường Sơn (2024), "Kết quả điều trị phẫu thuật cắt khối tá đầu tụy điều trị ung thư quanh bóng vater tại Bệnh viện Đa khoa tỉnh Thanh Hóa", Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 537(1B).
4. Chatani, S., et al. (2018), "Transcatheter Arterial Embolization for Postoperative Bleeding Following Abdominal Surgery", Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 41(9), pp. 1346-1355.
5. Tasu, J. P., et al. (2015), "Postoperative abdominal bleeding", Diagn Interv Imaging. 96(7-8), pp. 823-31.
6. Yu, Q., Funaki, B., and Ahmed, O. (2024), "Twenty years of embolization for acute lower gastrointestinal bleeding: a meta-analysis of rebleeding and ischaemia rates", Br J Radiol. 97(1157), pp. 920-932.
7. Delf, J., et al. (2023), "Haematological risk factors predicting clinical success in transarterial embolisation for acute gastrointestinal bleeding", Br J Radiol. 96(1144), p. 20211351.
8. Toyoda, H., et al. (1995), "Transcatheter arterial embolization for massive bleeding from duodenal ulcers not controlled by endoscopic hemostasis", Endoscopy. 27(4), pp. 304-7.
9. Lê, Thanh Dũng và cs (2023), "Can thiệp nội mạch điều trị xuất huyết tiêu hoá cao tại Bệnh viện Hữu nghị Việt Đức", Tạp chí Y học Việt Nam. 526(2).