TỔNG QUAN CHẤT LIỆU TẠO HÌNH XƯƠNG CON

Quang Huy Nguyễn, Thị Bích Đào Phạm, Quý Đôn Nguyễn, Thị Hằng Nguyễn

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To describe the characteristics of studies on materials used in ossiculoplasty. Methods: A narrative review was conducted based on peer-reviewed English-language articles published between 2000 and June 2024, sourced from PubMed and the Hanoi Medical University Library using relevant keywords. Results: Among 78 identified articles, 19 met inclusion criteria. Thirteen types of materials were reported. The most effective materials were HA-HAP (72.73% of patients achieved ABG < 10 dB), homologous nasal septal cartilage (90% achieved ABG < 20 dB), and Mimix hydroxyapatite (mean ABG reduction of 17 dB). Most studies were retrospective (57.89%) and conducted in both developed and developing countries (USA, Germany, India, South Korea, Turkey). Complications such as prosthesis displacement, extrusion, joint adhesion, and cholesteatoma were infrequent. Conclusion: The diversity of prosthetic materials supports tailored treatment in ossiculoplasty. Among them, homologous nasal septal cartilage, HA-HAP cement, and Mimix hydroxyapatite showed the most favorable hearing outcomes.

Article Details

References

Prasad KC, Koneru P, Swapanthi MB, Anjali PK, Gopi IV. Comparision of Allogenic Cartilage and Autologous Cortical Bone in Ossicular Reconstruction: A Comparative Study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2022 Aug;74(Suppl 1):148-152. doi: 10.1007/s12070-020-01924-8. Epub 2020 Jun 27. PMID: 36032828; PMCID: PMC9411363.
2. Mohan A, Bhagat S, Sahni D, Kaur G. Use of Glass Ionomer Cement for Incudostapedial Rebridging Ossiculoplasty. Iran J Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Mar;33(115):65-70. doi: 10.22038/ijorl. 2020. 46375.2518. PMID: 33912480; PMCID: PMC8052484.
3. Goldenberg RA, Driver M. Long-term results with hydroxylapatite middle ear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 May;122(5): 635-42. doi: 10.1016/S0194-5998(00)70188-4. PMID: 10793338.
4. Zhang LC, Zhang TY, Dai PD, Luo JF. Titanium versus non-titanium prostheses in ossiculoplasty: a meta-analysis. Acta Otolaryngol. 2011 Jul;131(7):708-15. doi: 10.3109/ 00016489. 2011.556662. Epub 2011 Apr 15. PMID: 21492071.
5. Hillman TA, Shelton C. Ossicular chain reconstruction: titanium versus plastipore. Laryngoscope. 2003 Oct;113(10):1731-5. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200310000-00013. Erratum in: Laryngoscope. 2004 Feb;114(2):388. PMID: 14520098.
6. Moon IS, Song MH, Kim HN, Chung MH, Lee WS, Lee HK. Hearing results after ossiculoplasty using Polycel prosthesis. Acta Otolaryngol. 2007 Jan;127(1):20-4. doi: 10.1080/00016480500488925. PMID: 17364324.
7. Martin AD, Harner SG. Ossicular reconstruction with titanium prosthesis. Laryngoscope. 2004 Jan;114(1):61-4. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200401000-00010. PMID: 14709996.
8. Gardner EK, Jackson CG, Kaylie DM. Results with titanium ossicular reconstruction prostheses. Laryngoscope. 2004 Jan;114(1):65-70. doi: 10.1097/ 00005537-200401000-00011. PMID: 14709997.
9. Gelfand YM, Chang CY. Ossicular chain reconstruction using titanium versus hydroxyapatite implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2011 Jun;144(6): 954-8. doi: 10.1177/ 0194599811399738. Epub 2011 Feb 18. PMID: 21493321.