ANATOMICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF THE UPPER CERVICAL SPINE ON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY IN ADULTS AT VIET DUC UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL

Hoàng Long Nguyễn, Thái Hà Dương Nguyễn, Anh Tú Nguyễn, Tiến Huy Võ

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to describe and evaluate the anatomical characteristics of the upper cervical spine on multi-detector computed tomography scans in adult Vietnamese individuals. Materials and Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional descriptive study on 288 cervical computed tomography scans of adults at Viet Duc University Hospital. Results: The mean dimensions of the posterior arch of C1 in terms of width, length, and height were 12,0±2,7mm, 20,9±1,9mm, và 6,4±1,9mm, respectively. The lateral mass of C1 had an average width, length, and height of 9,8±1,5mm, 28,1±2,2mm, và 14,6±1,9mm, respectively. The C2 pedicle had mean dimensions of 6,3±1,6mm in width, 31,2±3,0mm in length, 10,0±1,2mm in height, and a pedicle angle of 38,0°±5,8°. The mean dimensions of the C2 lamina were 5,9±1,3mm in width, 32,7 ± 3,4mm in length, 12,8±1,9mm in height, and a laminar angle of 48,2°±3,8°. Conclusion: The study confirms that the anatomical characteristics of the C1–C2 spine are similar to those of Asian populations, but show significant differences when compared to European populations. Notable anatomical variations were observed between sexes and between the left and right sides. The results of this study help optimize surgical technique selection, improving safety and effectiveness.

Article Details

References

Okereke I, Mmerem K, Balasubramanian D. The Management of Cervical Spine Injuries - A Literature Review. Orthop Res Rev. 2021;13:151-162. doi:10.2147/ORR.S324622
2. Cheung JPY, Luk KDK. Complications of Anterior and Posterior Cervical Spine Surgery. Asian Spine J. 2016;10(2):385-400. doi:10.4184/ asj.2016.10.2.385
3. Gebauer M, Barvencik F, Briem D, et al. Evaluation of anatomic landmarks and safe zones for screw placement in the atlas via the posterior arch. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc. 2010;19(1):85-90. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-1181-8
4. Chan AKH, Yusof MI, Abdullah MS. Computed Tomographic Morphometric Analysis of C1 and C2 for Lamina Cross Screw Placement in Malay Ethnicity. Asian Spine J. 2021;15(1):1-8. doi:10.31616/asj.2019.0242
5. Yuwakosol P, Oearsakul T, Tunthanathip T. Morphometry of the C2 Pedicle and Lamina in Thai Patients. Asian J Neurosurg. 2020;15(1):39-44. doi:10.4103/ajns.AJNS_312_19
6. Ma XY, Yin QS, Wu ZH, Xia H, Liu JF, Zhong SZ. Anatomic considerations for the pedicle screw placement in the first cervical vertebra. Spine. 2005;30(13): 1519-1523. doi:10.1097/01.brs. 0000168546.17788.49
7. Kim YJ, Rhee WT, Lee SB, You SH, Lee SY. Computerized tomographic measurements of morphometric parameters of the c2 for the feasibility of laminar screw fixation in korean population. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2008;44(1): 15-18. doi:10.3340/jkns.2008.44.1.15
8. Christensen DM, Eastlack RK, Lynch JJ, Yaszemski MJ, Currier BL. C1 anatomy and dimensions relative to lateral mass screw placement. Spine. 2007;32(8):844-848. doi:10. 1097/01.brs.0000259833.02179.c0
9. Harms J, Melcher RP. Posterior C1-C2 fusion with polyaxial screw and rod fixation. Spine. 2001;26(22): 2467-2471. doi:10.1097/00007632-200111150-00014
10. Yeom JS, Buchowski JM, Kim HJ, Chang BS, Lee CK, Riew KD. Risk of vertebral artery injury: comparison between C1-C2 transarticular and C2 pedicle screws. Spine J Off J North Am Spine Soc. 2013; 13(7): 775-785. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2013. 04.005