ROLE OF ROUTINE X-RAY IN DIAGNOSIS OF PRIMARY KNEE OSTEOARTHRITIS
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study was conducted on 76 patients with primary knee osteoarthritis, stages II, III, who came for examination and treatment at VietDuc Hospital. Objectives: Describe some routine X-ray imaging characteristics of the patients. primary knee osteoarthritis. Method: The patient was X-rayed of the knee joint in both posteroanterior lateral and view with a standing position with weight bearing. The degree of osteoarthritis was assessed according to the Kellgren-Lawrence criteria, describing the damage according to the OARSI scale. Results: Bone spurs were present in all patients. Joint space, subchondral bone thickening and bone head deformity accounted for 82.6%, 76.1% and 60.9%, respectively. The grade II degenerative group has a score of 1.5-2 according to OARSI, while for the group with grade III degeneration, the score is from 2.2-2.7. Conclusion: Despite the widespread use of joint ultrasonography and magnetic resonance tomography in clinical practice, conventional radiography of the knee remains the "gold" standard in the contemporary assessment of osteoarthritic knee.
Article Details
Keywords
radiography, osteoarthriti, bone spurs
References
2 Culvenor, Adam G., et al. "Defining the presence of radiographic knee osteoarthritis: a comparison between the Kellgren and Lawrence system and OARSI atlas criteria." Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy 23.12 (2015): 3532-3539.
3 Arden, Nigel, and Michael C. Nevitt. "Osteoarthritis: epidemiology." Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology 20, no. 1 (2006): 3-25.
4 Loeser, Richard F., et al. "Osteoarthritis: a disease of the joint as an organ." Arthritis & Rheumatism 64.6 (2012): 1697-1707.
5 Messieh SS, Fowler PJ, Munro T. Anteroposterior radiographs of the osteoarthritic knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1990;72(4):639–640
6 LaValley, Michael P., et al. "The lateral view radiograph for assessment of the tibiofemoral joint space in knee osteoarthritis: its reliability, sensitivity to change, and longitudinal validity." Arthritis & Rheumatism 52.11 (2005): 3542-3547