HISTOPATHOLOGICAL CHARACTERISTICS AND PROGNOSTIC FACTORS OF HEPATOCELLULAR CARCINOMA AFTER RESECTION

Thị Thuý Nga Nguyễn, Quang Diện Trịnh , Văn Tờ Tạ

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents a significant global cancer burden, with relatively poor prognosis following hepatic resection. This study aimed to describe certain histopathological characteristics of HCC according to the 2019 World Health Organization (WHO) classification and to evaluate their association with patient survival. Methods: A retrospective, cross-sectional study with longitudinal follow-up was conducted on 330 HCC patients who underwent liver resection at K Hospital, Tan Trieu branch. Histopathological features were recorded and analyzed. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate survival rates; univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. Results: Stage IB and II accounted for 45.8% and 39.4% of cases, respectively. Liver fibrosis in non-tumorous tissue was mainly F2–F3. The predominant histological subtype was the conventional type (82.4%), followed by macrotrabecular (12.4%). Moderate differentiation was most common (62.7%), while poor differentiation was found in 31.8%. Vascular invasion was present in 45.8%, perineural invasion in 2.1%, and tumor necrosis in 51.5%. There were 66 deaths among 263 cases, with a mean survival time of 35.6 ± 15.2 months. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival rates were 90.9%, 82.5%, and 74.5%, respectively. Univariate analysis identified age, tumor size, TNM stage, macrotrabecular subtype, histological grade, vascular invasion, tumor necrosis, and fibrosis stage as prognostic factors. Multivariate analysis revealed poor differentiation and advanced fibrosis (F4–6) as independent prognostic factors. Conclusion: The conventional subtype is the most common histological pattern. Vascular invasion and tumor necrosis are frequently observed. Histopathological features such as fibrosis stage, subtype, histological grade, vascular invasion, and tumor necrosis are associated with survival prognosis, with poor differentiation and advanced fibrosis being independent predictors.

Article Details

References

Roseman BJ, Roh MS. Prognostic factors in surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. In: Pollock RE, ed. Surgical Oncology. Cancer Treatment and Research. Springer US; 1997:331-345. doi:10.1007/978-1-4615-6165-1_17.
2. Sweed D, Sweed E, Moaz I, et al. The clinicopathological and prognostic factors of hepatocellular carcinoma: a 10-year tertiary center experience in Egypt. World J Surg Oncol. 2022;20(1):298.doi:10.1186/s12957-022-02764-2
3. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, et al. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024;74(3):229-263. doi:10.3322/caac.21834.
4. Yasukawa K, Shimizu A, Kubota K, et al. Impact of Liver Fibrosis Severity on Oncological Prognosis in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Liver Cancer. 2023;13(2): 150-160. doi:10.1159/ 000533857.
5. Qin LX, Tang ZY. The prognostic significance of clinical and pathological features in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2002;8(2):193-199. doi:10.3748/wjg.v8.i2.193.
6. Rodríguez-Perálvarez M, Luong TV, Andreana L, Meyer T, Dhillon AP, Burroughs AK. A systematic review of microvascular invasion in hepatocellular carcinoma: diagnostic and prognostic variability. Ann Surg Oncol. 2013; 20(1):325-339. doi:10.1245/s10434-012-2513-1
7. Reveron‐Thornton RF, Teng MLP, Lee EY, et al. Global and regional long‐term survival following resection for HCC in the recent decade: A meta‐analysis of 110 studies. Hepatol Commun. 2022;6(7):1813-1826. doi:10.1002/hep4.1923.
8. Simonetti RG, Cammà C, Fiorello F, Politi F, D’Amico G, Pagliaro L. Hepatocellular carcinoma. A worldwide problem and the major risk factors. Dig Dis Sci. 1991;36(7):962-972. doi:10.1007/BF01297149.
9. Lee Y, Park H, Lee H, et al. The Clinicopathological and Prognostic Significance of the Gross Classification of Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Pathol Transl Med. 2018;52(2):85-92. doi:10.4132/jptm.2017.11.13.