APPLICATION OF THE MELD 3.0 SCORE IN PREDICTING 90-DAY MORTALITY IN PATIENTS WITH DECOMPENSATED CIRRHOSIS

Nhật Huyền Phạm, Ngọc Ánh Trần

Main Article Content

Abstract

Cirrhosis remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Early prognostication is essential for clinical decision-making and resource allocation in patients with liver cirrhosis. The MELD 3.0 score is a recent update of the original MELD model, optimized to enhance prognostic accuracy, particularly in predicting 90-day mortality. Methods: A prospective descriptive study was conducted on 100 patients diagnosed with liver cirrhosis at Hanoi Medical University Hospital. Clinical characteristics, laboratory parameters, and MELD-based scores (MELD, MELD-Na, MELD 3.0) were recorded and analyzed. The predictive performance for 90-day mortality was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Results: The mean age of the study population was 56.9 ± 10.2 years. The majority of patients were male (86%), with a female-to-male ratio of approximately 1:6. The most common etiology was alcohol-related liver disease (61%), followed by hepatitis B (16%), hepatitis C (3%), dual HBV/HCV infection (1%), and other causes (12%) including autoimmune hepatitis, primary biliary cirrhosis, and cryptogenic cirrhosis. The mean MELD 3.0 score was 18.9 ± 5.5. MELD 3.0 demonstrated good prognostic ability for predicting 90-day mortality, with an area under the ROC curve (AUROC) of 0.747 (p < 0.05). At the optimal cutoff point of 19, MELD 3.0 yielded a sensitivity of 92% and specificity of 52%.The AUROC values for MELD 3.0, MELD-Na, and MELD were 0.747, 0.726, and 0.711, respectively. Although MELD 3.0 showed the highest predictive accuracy, the differences among the models were not statistically significant. Conclusions: The MELD 3.0 score provides acceptable predictive performance for short-term mortality in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. While it demonstrates a slightly better discriminative ability than MELD and MELD-Na, further large-scale studies are warranted to confirm its clinical superiority

Article Details

References

Asrani SK, Devarbhavi H, Eaton J, Kamath PS. Burden of liver diseases in the world. J Hepatol. 2019;70(1):151-171. doi:10.1016/j.jhep. 2018.09.014
2. Gánh nặng toàn cầu, khu vực và quốc gia về bệnh viêm gan B, 1990–2019: Phân tích có hệ thống cho Nghiên cứu gánh nặng bệnh tật toàn cầu 2019 | Viện Đo lường và Đánh giá Sức khỏe. Accessed June 23, 2024. https://www.healthdata.org/research-analysis/library/global-regional-and-national-burden-hepatitis-b-1990-2019-systematic
3. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of patients with decompensated cirrhosis. J Hepatol. 2018;69(2):406-460. doi:10. 1016/j.jhep.2018.03.024
4. Nguyễn Thị Mai Hương (2011). Giá trị thang điểm MELD trong tiên lượng bệnh nhân xơ gan , luận văn thạc sỹ y học. Đại học Y Hà Nội
5. Lin H, Loi PL, Ng J, et al. MELD3.0 is superior to MELDNa and MELD for prediction of mortality in patients with cirrhosis: An external validation in a multi‐ethnic population. JGH Open. 2024;8(6):e13098. doi:10.1002/jgh3.13098
6. Yoo JJ, Chang JI, Moon JE, Sinn DH, Kim SG, Kim YS. Validation of MELD 3.0 scoring system in East Asian patients with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation. Liver Transplantation. 2023; 29(10): 1029. doi: 10.1097/LVT. 0000000000000126