CLINICAL AND CARDIAC MRI CHARACTERISTICS IN HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS WITH ACUTE MYOCARDITIS
Main Article Content
Abstract
Objective: To describe the clinical, paraclinical, and cardiac MRI characteristics of patients with acute myocarditis admitted to Cho Ray Hospital in 2021-2022, and to analyze the relationship between clinical–laboratory parameters and the extent of myocardial injury. Methods: A retrospective descriptive study was conducted on 218 patients aged ≥16 years diagnosed with acute myocarditis confirmed by cardiac MRI according to the 2018 Lake Louise criteria. Clinical features, laboratory results, ECG, echocardiography, and MRI findings were collected from hospital records between January 1, 2021 and December 31, 2022. Results: The mean age was 41.2 ± 16.9 years, and males accounted for 63.3%. The most common symptoms were fever (72%), chest pain (62%), and dyspnea (59%). Elevated Troponin I (95%) and CK-MB (91%) indicated significant myocardial injury. The mean ejection fraction (EF) was 44.1 ± 12.9%, with 28.4% of patients showing EF < 35%. Cardiac MRI revealed myocardial edema in 82.1%, positive LGE in 77.1%, and diffuse involvement (≥3 segments) in 48.2% of patients. Elevated cardiac enzymes, myocardial injury detected on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction are highly diagnostic indicators of myocarditis. Conclusion: Acute myocarditis at Cho Ray Hospital predominantly affected young adults, with nonspecific clinical manifestations. Cardiac MRI played a crucial role in diagnosis and risk stratification, allowing early detection of diffuse myocardial involvement and guiding timely management.
Article Details
Keywords
Acute myocarditis, cardiac MRI, Troponin, ejection fraction, Cho Ray Hospital.
References
2. Lampejo T, Durkin SM, Bhatt N, Guttmann O. Acute myocarditis: aetiology, diagnosis and management. Clin Med (Lond). Sep 2021;21(5): e505–e510. doi:10.7861/clinmed.2021-0121
3. Piccirillo F, Watanabe M, Di Sciascio G. Diagnosis, treatment and predictors of prognosis of myocarditis. A narrative review. Cardiovasc Pathol. Sep–Oct 2021;54:107362. doi:10.1016/ j.carpath.2021.107362
4. Wang YW, Liu RB, Huang CY, et al. Global, regional, and national burdens of myocarditis, 1990-2019: systematic analysis from GBD 2019: GBD for myocarditis. BMC Public Health. Apr 19 2023;23(1):714.doi:10.1186/s12889-023-15539-5
5. Zhang YD, Chen N, Wang QY, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of myocarditis in children aged 0-14 years, 1990-2021: analysis for the global burden of disease study 2021. Front Public Health. 2024;12: 1504586. doi:10.3389/ fpubh.2024.1504586
6. Gräni C, Eichhorn C, Bière L, et al. Prognostic Value of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Tissue Characterization in Risk Stratifying Patients With Suspected Myocarditis. J Am Coll Cardiol. Oct 17 2017;70(16):1964–1976. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017. 08.050
7. Li S, Duan X, Feng G, et al. Multiparametric Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance in Acute Myocarditis: Comparison of 2009 and 2018 Lake Louise Criteria With Endomyocardial Biopsy Confirmation. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021; 8:739892. doi:10.3389/fcvm.2021.739892
8. Ammirati E, Veronese G, Brambatti M, et al. Fulminant Versus Acute Nonfulminant Myocarditis in Patients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. Jul 23 2019;74(3):299–311. doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2019.04.063
9. Felker GM, Thompson RE, Hare JM, et al. Underlying causes and long-term survival in patients with initially unexplained cardiomyopathy. N Engl J Med. Apr 13 2000; 342(15): 1077–84. doi:10.1056/ nejm200004133421502
10. Sarda L, Colin P, Boccara F, et al. Myocarditis in patients with clinical presentation of myocardial infarction and normal coronary angiograms. J Am Coll Cardiol. Mar 1 2001;37(3):786–92. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)01201-8