OUTCOME OF TRANSFORAMINAL LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION IN THE TREATMENT OF LUMBOSACRAL SPONDYLOLISTHESIS IN OSTEOPOROTIC PATIENTS

Đức Cường Nguyễn, Mạnh Hải Đinh, Huy Mạnh Bùi, Thành Tam Nguyễn, Thị Bạch Diệp Phạm, Thị Thùy Linh Trần

Main Article Content

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) surgery in the treatment of lumbosacral spondylolisthesis in osteoporotic patients. Methods: A retrospective descriptive study of 48 osteoporotic patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis who underwent transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) at Hanoi Medical University Hospital from January 2023 to December 2023. Results: In our study, the average age was 64.6 ± 5.2 years (ranging from 55 to 81). The female-to-male ratio was 7:1. Only 14.6% of patients received osteoporosis treatment prior to surgery. All patients presented with low back pain accompanied by neurological claudication. The average preoperative VAS score for back pain was 6.96 ± 0.98, and for radicular leg pain, it was 6.63 ± 1.19. Step-off sign was observed in 29.2% of patients. Sphincter dysfunction was noted in 6.2%. The average preoperative ODI score was 60.1 ± 8.1. Isthmic  spondylolisthesis was found in 11 patients (22.9%). Coexisting spinal canal stenosis was present in 34% of patients (70.1%). The average preoperative bone mineral density (BMD) was -2.9 ± 0.4. Mean operative time was 109.1 ± 22.4 minutes. Intraoperative complication of dural tear occurred in 2 patients (4.3%). Postoperative clinical symptoms improved significantly. The average hospital stay was 8.6 ± 2.6 days. VAS scores for back and leg pain showed statistically significant improvement at 1 and 6 months  postoperatively (p < 0.01). ODI scores also improved significantly at the 6-month follow-up. The rates of good and fair fusion at 6 months were 72.9% and 20.8%, respectively. At 12 months, 3 patients (6.3%) experienced cage subsidence and 4 patients (8.3%) had screw loosening. Conclusion: Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion is clinically effective in treating lumbar spondylolisthesis in osteoporotic patients, with significant improvements in VAS and ODI scores, high fusion rates, and low complication rates. Adherence to osteoporosis treatment plays an important role.

Article Details

References

Porter JL, Varacallo M. Osteoporosis. StatPearls: Treasure Island (FL); 2023.
2. Lan HPT, Uyen NTD. Reference ranges for bone mineral density and prevalence of osteoporosis in Vietnamese men and women. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:1-7.
3. Dai F, Liu Y, Zhang F, et al. Surgical treatment of the osteoporotic spine with bone cement-injectable cannulated pedicle screw fixation: technical description and preliminary application in 43 patients. Clinics. 2015;70:114-119.
4. Lê Bá Tùng, Dương Đại Hà. Đánh giá kết quả điều trị trượt đốt sống ở bệnh nhân loãng xương. Tạp Chí Học Cộng Đồng. 2024;65(2).
5. Kiều Đình Hùng, Nguyễn Vũ, Đinh Mạnh Hải. Kết quả điều trị trượt đốt sống thắt lưng tại Bệnh viện Đại học Y Hà Nội. Tạp chí nghiên cứu Y học, 2021; 169-175
6. Đỗ Mạnh Hùng, Phạm Minh Đức. Kết quả hàn xương liên thân đốt lối sau (TLIF) cho bệnh nhân trượt đốt sống thắt lưng có loãng xương tại bệnh viện Việt Đức. Tạp chí y học việt Nam, 2025; 1-3
7. Jae Hwan Cho, Chang Ju Hwang. Effect of osteoporosis on the clinical and radiological outcomes following one-level posterior lumbar interbody fusion. Journal of Orthopaedic Science 2018; 1-8
8. Peter M. Formby, Daniel G. Kang. Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Patients with Osteoporosis. Global Spine J 2016;6:660–664